Wladimir J. van der Laan [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-08-24 📝 Original message:> NODE_BLOOM is distinct ...
📅 Original date posted:2015-08-24
📝 Original message:> NODE_BLOOM is distinct from NODE_NETWORK, and it is legal to advertise
> NODE_BLOOM but not NODE_NETWORK (eg for nodes running in pruned mode
> which, nonetheless, provide filtered access to the data which they do have).
But is this useful without having decided on a way to signal which blocks pruned nodes do have?
It looks like the part between paranthesis is speculation and should be left to a future BIP.
Wladimir
Published at
2023-06-07 15:49:05Event JSON
{
"id": "aa13cc66b9b303581674368310e92cab996c2341b63a3ae39587fbf7ca2d83b0",
"pubkey": "5c0b7fca51fd4830b4d9f840de063faebeeabd3bb5dd118de9cdf50a6feaaf98",
"created_at": 1686152945,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"677b2789bd9260c9edc4dfff20558f27945c985e840da0da606941d73d12b50b",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"628beb3b4f86eafca08736c76068d5ae75389aa0f4cefd6f26c5b37a689c37d1",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"cd753aa8fbc112e14ffe9fe09d3630f0eff76ca68e376e004b8e77b687adddba"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-08-24\n📝 Original message:\u003e NODE_BLOOM is distinct from NODE_NETWORK, and it is legal to advertise\n\u003e NODE_BLOOM but not NODE_NETWORK (eg for nodes running in pruned mode\n\u003e which, nonetheless, provide filtered access to the data which they do have).\n\nBut is this useful without having decided on a way to signal which blocks pruned nodes do have?\n\nIt looks like the part between paranthesis is speculation and should be left to a future BIP. \n\nWladimir",
"sig": "709cad8306029b9df381a2c500501a01aec6ee8687bab8003da4c2c668dacf9864977f43cef35ffd27871943013bd98fe878ecf88076eef443396a9734a3a0a0"
}