📅 Original date posted:2015-09-03
📝 Original message:> Any such a BIP like this needs to
> document the natural forces involved in real-world acceptance, not try to
lay
> down "rules" that people are expected to follow.
That's my goal: to take the hodgepodge of we already use for acceptance,
and apply rules that allow true acceptance to be identified in a clearer
way.
If people don't follow the "rules" then the system simply won't work, this
is mentioned in the last section.
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Luke Dashjr <luke at dashjr.org> wrote:
> On Friday, September 04, 2015 12:30:50 AM Andy Chase via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> > Here's a BIP. I wrote the BIP mostly to stir the pot on ideas of
> > governance, but I’m moderately serious about it.
>
> Sigh. There is *no governance at all*. Any such a BIP like this needs to
> document the natural forces involved in real-world acceptance, not try to
> lay
> down "rules" that people are expected to follow.
>
> For hardforks, that means economic consensus. For softforks, miner
> majority.
> For basically anything else, real-world implementation and use (by any
> significant quantity of people).
>
> Luke
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150903/1f4e33fd/attachment.html>;
Andy Chase [ARCHIVE] /
npub1hg…2pv20
2023-06-07 17:39:35
in reply to nevent1q…mgme
Author Public Key
npub1hgz0f5ghpavn49u2h2za7464v9w02fd534nx5w268plwr06zal3s32pv20Published at
2023-06-07 17:39:35Event JSON
{
"id": "aab2e5658797600aa491b894f28f5d2fe293363da6cbe90b6e82891d66968db4",
"pubkey": "ba04f4d1170f593a978aba85df5755615cf525b48d666a395a387ee1bf42efe3",
"created_at": 1686159575,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"9c96b271d28066e4cb9eb50131a2ba9c23f5c1ad1af3e01fa5e76e13c28699d2",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"c0ae4a714a2e62ede0d44c85eda6c496747128d85216fb708de83558fd012cc3",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"5a6d1f44482b67b5b0d30cc1e829b66a251f0dc99448377dbe3c5e0faf6c3803"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-09-03\n📝 Original message:\u003e Any such a BIP like this needs to\n\u003e document the natural forces involved in real-world acceptance, not try to\nlay\n\u003e down \"rules\" that people are expected to follow.\n\nThat's my goal: to take the hodgepodge of we already use for acceptance,\nand apply rules that allow true acceptance to be identified in a clearer\nway.\n\nIf people don't follow the \"rules\" then the system simply won't work, this\nis mentioned in the last section.\n\nOn Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Luke Dashjr \u003cluke at dashjr.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e On Friday, September 04, 2015 12:30:50 AM Andy Chase via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e \u003e Here's a BIP. I wrote the BIP mostly to stir the pot on ideas of\n\u003e \u003e governance, but I’m moderately serious about it.\n\u003e\n\u003e Sigh. There is *no governance at all*. Any such a BIP like this needs to\n\u003e document the natural forces involved in real-world acceptance, not try to\n\u003e lay\n\u003e down \"rules\" that people are expected to follow.\n\u003e\n\u003e For hardforks, that means economic consensus. For softforks, miner\n\u003e majority.\n\u003e For basically anything else, real-world implementation and use (by any\n\u003e significant quantity of people).\n\u003e\n\u003e Luke\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150903/1f4e33fd/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "f232dc9d8f1fe96a355e6a22b4ac207eabb9e7217d2acbe954a9555e92a650b46c88ce5ef5b8320d225f192b7a871562444fff4df94ec872b00130d7a63f3c4a"
}