If they decide not to pay a specific miner, technically where would the bitcoin go instead? Not to their own address, so instead spread out to other miners minus that one miner, or something else?
If so, they would sound more like breach of responsibilities rather than a custodial relationship. Are there precedents for being labeled a custodian despite not holding someone else’s bitcoin in an address you control?
LynAlden / Lyn Alden
npub1a2…cw83a
2023-11-29 18:08:51
in reply to nevent1q…2tux
Author Public Key
npub1a2cww4kn9wqte4ry70vyfwqyqvpswksna27rtxd8vty6c74era8sdcw83aPublished at
2023-11-29 18:08:51Event JSON
{
"id": "aaa4ed07687c9a2b61e22254800accc4d3532a602daccfc237ca0b698d74740c",
"pubkey": "eab0e756d32b80bcd464f3d844b8040303075a13eabc3599a762c9ac7ab91f4f",
"created_at": 1701281331,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"cb752c76c00e2ad948623bf404d104b9d107da4909b0fab511fee9da0bf9c9d5"
],
[
"e",
"1a3fd015254d225a8ca758e122ac22b3d07ba4d7f0101b6bb679c56287254dad"
],
[
"p",
"9267545d2917b80f707ffdb44a8ff979182568ef7baa04ee756b1f01d4e3688a"
],
[
"p",
"3d2e51508699f98f0f2bdbe7a45b673c687fe6420f466dc296d90b908d51d594"
]
],
"content": "If they decide not to pay a specific miner, technically where would the bitcoin go instead? Not to their own address, so instead spread out to other miners minus that one miner, or something else?\n\nIf so, they would sound more like breach of responsibilities rather than a custodial relationship. Are there precedents for being labeled a custodian despite not holding someone else’s bitcoin in an address you control?",
"sig": "6c7f8eb4b606a4ed49de7c4251d4988cde5ee4fd15eeb35e57c322c7026b6486b47131f5e22d5387661f66b67125ab408997df7d949d10ab5cef3cb78b2830cb"
}