AbstractEquilibrium on Nostr: 9% of node runners prefer a single-contributor downstream repo from core. This is ...
9% of node runners prefer a single-contributor downstream repo from core.
This is bad; the order of operations (if decentralized resilience is the fundamental goal) is going backwards, and the priority seems out of line.
Bitcoin Core may not be the worst vulnerability we should be focusing on today.
Published at
2025-05-14 21:17:56Event JSON
{
"id": "a7b55e78097d3a9a8c0b17143dda598dd1749786d125339c563fa1bda07909e7",
"pubkey": "f26626a94189b945a0f0146b16c4f8a6ced31b359848433fb6306f8d6eec3661",
"created_at": 1747257476,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"a52bb762d30e164d99caa6b795444b60a2f6d3b11668161a3405036748333cb7",
"",
"root"
],
[
"p",
"2183e94758481d0f124fbd93c56ccaa45e7e545ceeb8d52848f98253f497b975"
]
],
"content": "9% of node runners prefer a single-contributor downstream repo from core.\n\nThis is bad; the order of operations (if decentralized resilience is the fundamental goal) is going backwards, and the priority seems out of line.\n\nBitcoin Core may not be the worst vulnerability we should be focusing on today.",
"sig": "02660cdb382c702fce8422c7bf512e265ba71cdd8276726ee2c1b612296634d1fd747d1777565b22723811ea5ec2fbeb8bf91978fa3ca0e47cd0ef518a19986d"
}
