📅 Original date posted:2014-09-15
📝 Original message:On 15 September 2014 09:23, Thomas Zander <thomas at thomaszander.se> wrote:
> On Sunday 14. September 2014 08.28.27 Peter Todd wrote:
> > Do we have any evidence Satoshi ever even had access to that key? Did he
> > ever use PGP at all for anything?
>
> Any and all PGP related howtos will tell you that you should not trust or
> sign
> a formerly-untrusted PGP (or GPG for that matter) key without seeing that
> person in real life, verifying their identity etc.
>
> I think that kind of disqualifies pgp for identity purposes wrt Satoshi :-)
>
But I presume that if the key is on bitcoin.org, you can probably infer
that the owner of the key and the original owner of bitcoin.org are one and
the same ...
>
> --
> Thomas Zander
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Want excitement?
> Manually upgrade your production database.
> When you want reliability, choose Perforce
> Perforce version control. Predictably reliable.
>
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140915/bf82a94b/attachment.html>;
Melvin Carvalho [ARCHIVE] /
npub1uv…saxrt
2023-06-07 15:25:45
in reply to nevent1q…mc0m
Author Public Key
npub1uvtfvcegcn9kds68r8he57emc480vqtx8t22kpsctxgjxae44gvsksaxrtPublished at
2023-06-07 15:25:45Event JSON
{
"id": "f1179e5fe97d7436e483aea07fdc679dfe7d76f9afd7f8cc9e352d0668054cdf",
"pubkey": "e316966328c4cb66c34719ef9a7b3bc54ef601663ad4ab06185991237735aa19",
"created_at": 1686151545,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"eaac3fd254257c5f067156e98a14f377d806c5143b78136b7c018a295cb8236e",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"13873cc935e9260a510c864a5bfa24b46b411e6b478146b6eebc015171ea9bec",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"6f226bd1c86c22aed12ec82cd2dab4b5e2f77fd662ac4e1f881170a12da87bd6"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2014-09-15\n📝 Original message:On 15 September 2014 09:23, Thomas Zander \u003cthomas at thomaszander.se\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e On Sunday 14. September 2014 08.28.27 Peter Todd wrote:\n\u003e \u003e Do we have any evidence Satoshi ever even had access to that key? Did he\n\u003e \u003e ever use PGP at all for anything?\n\u003e\n\u003e Any and all PGP related howtos will tell you that you should not trust or\n\u003e sign\n\u003e a formerly-untrusted PGP (or GPG for that matter) key without seeing that\n\u003e person in real life, verifying their identity etc.\n\u003e\n\u003e I think that kind of disqualifies pgp for identity purposes wrt Satoshi :-)\n\u003e\n\nBut I presume that if the key is on bitcoin.org, you can probably infer\nthat the owner of the key and the original owner of bitcoin.org are one and\nthe same ...\n\n\n\u003e\n\u003e --\n\u003e Thomas Zander\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e ------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\u003e Want excitement?\n\u003e Manually upgrade your production database.\n\u003e When you want reliability, choose Perforce\n\u003e Perforce version control. Predictably reliable.\n\u003e\n\u003e http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191\u0026iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e Bitcoin-development mailing list\n\u003e Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net\n\u003e https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140915/bf82a94b/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "404a79ea15ca268cf6798cedc33113e68023020ee0440002486d9145750e19edb72b590088c3043024d3bc7fd4d7989d4d78ad3aa4e4896fc34a0a89de5f9385"
}