Christian Decker [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: ๐
Original date posted:2011-06-13 ๐๏ธ Summary of this message: The Bitcoin ...
๐
Original date posted:2011-06-13
๐๏ธ Summary of this message: The Bitcoin community is discussing the adoption of BitTorrent tracker bootstrapping as a simpler alternative to the current IRC bootstrapping mechanism.
๐ Original message:Hi all.
Just wanted to carry the discussion from the Forum over to the dev-list.
We have quite a few bootstrapping mechanisms, starting with the overly
complex (IMHO) IRC bootstrapping, which is often suspected as bot-activity.
Then we have a few hardcoded nodes and some fallback nodes. I was wondering
why we didn't adopt BitTorrent tracker bootstrapping until now? It's
basically all it does. Given a hash (SHA1 hash of the genesis bloc would be
nice ^^) it gives you a list of other nodes with the same hash.
Given that there are quite a few open trackers (accepting and tracking any
hash you throw at them) we could just decide to use 2-3 of those to
bootstrap.
The downside would be that they return bencoded data, which has to be
interpreted first, but it's easier than implementing the IRC stuff, I think.
Any comments?
Regards,
Chris
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <
http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20110613/099e3077/attachment.html>
Published at
2023-06-07 01:36:10Event JSON
{
"id": "f25e1a0d846ef0dabbe843eaaf83cf3c77537753f4fed33c3b1f98505f5fe52b",
"pubkey": "72cd40332ec782dd0a7f63acb03e3b6fdafa6d91bd1b6125cd8b7117a1bb8057",
"created_at": 1686101770,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"d4af95208a02346338d87b5f4cff7201ddbb16d7c929000819e611192dd8ceee",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"12dc1bf2ec09f6407949653c294d58098d157c0408628ecdf9a8239033e92ed2"
]
],
"content": "๐
Original date posted:2011-06-13\n๐๏ธ Summary of this message: The Bitcoin community is discussing the adoption of BitTorrent tracker bootstrapping as a simpler alternative to the current IRC bootstrapping mechanism.\n๐ Original message:Hi all.\n\nJust wanted to carry the discussion from the Forum over to the dev-list.\n\nWe have quite a few bootstrapping mechanisms, starting with the overly\ncomplex (IMHO) IRC bootstrapping, which is often suspected as bot-activity.\nThen we have a few hardcoded nodes and some fallback nodes. I was wondering\nwhy we didn't adopt BitTorrent tracker bootstrapping until now? It's\nbasically all it does. Given a hash (SHA1 hash of the genesis bloc would be\nnice ^^) it gives you a list of other nodes with the same hash.\n\nGiven that there are quite a few open trackers (accepting and tracking any\nhash you throw at them) we could just decide to use 2-3 of those to\nbootstrap.\n\nThe downside would be that they return bencoded data, which has to be\ninterpreted first, but it's easier than implementing the IRC stuff, I think.\n\nAny comments?\n\nRegards,\nChris\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20110613/099e3077/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "3b5d4ba63da30013126b89539043a7cf8d89cb2433816353117ebc015c5cffd289f801c4af382fa8e9b45a284b7823b6daaf69d0eae608cae22cee6be4bcb703"
}