📅 Original date posted:2013-12-04
📝 Original message:On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Peter Todd <pete at petertodd.org> wrote:
> replace-by-fee is no less speculative than your original proposals;
> you're also trying to convince people that things should work
> differently re: fees
The original proposal I started this thread with hasn't even received
comments - presumably it's uncontroversial. The other discussions are about
how to handle fees in requests that use the payment protocol, which isn't
currently used anywhere so doing things differently isn't possible.
On the other hand you have been talking about a fundamental change to the
behaviour of how all Bitcoin nodes operate, which is off topic for this
thread.
If you have something specific to say about how floating fees should be
managed by SPV wallets or how fees should be negotiated when the payment
protocol is in use, this thread is appropriate. Otherwise please take it
elsewhere.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20131204/c10ebe19/attachment.html>;
Mike Hearn [ARCHIVE] /
npub17t…4qgyd
2023-06-07 15:10:14
in reply to nevent1q…4ewv
Author Public Key
npub17ty4mumkv43w8wtt0xsz2jypck0gvw0j8xrcg6tpea25z2nh7meqf4qgydPublished at
2023-06-07 15:10:14Event JSON
{
"id": "f26461f3725ec5099390ecb0033e6341af18062efd883647c83e643fb79b5d4d",
"pubkey": "f2c95df3766562e3b96b79a0254881c59e8639f23987846961cf55412a77f6f2",
"created_at": 1686150614,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"f082c8a0fa2ac5febf83583d19b2776fdb1875fb3ab2eae661676f17ee054405",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"518dad197739288f7857d843679989d5223269af0e40d14b59f8fb5278315ea5",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2013-12-04\n📝 Original message:On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Peter Todd \u003cpete at petertodd.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e replace-by-fee is no less speculative than your original proposals;\n\u003e you're also trying to convince people that things should work\n\u003e differently re: fees\n\n\nThe original proposal I started this thread with hasn't even received\ncomments - presumably it's uncontroversial. The other discussions are about\nhow to handle fees in requests that use the payment protocol, which isn't\ncurrently used anywhere so doing things differently isn't possible.\n\nOn the other hand you have been talking about a fundamental change to the\nbehaviour of how all Bitcoin nodes operate, which is off topic for this\nthread.\n\nIf you have something specific to say about how floating fees should be\nmanaged by SPV wallets or how fees should be negotiated when the payment\nprotocol is in use, this thread is appropriate. Otherwise please take it\nelsewhere.\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20131204/c10ebe19/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "61e301fed30294aa2a958bfca61429bdb8ef0594f2b38119e6d6ce2cb31f85e2b19d0d08f597b3f04e54c527fa66d37fdec2f5ef61a48c0bc5621fb5fe069c7a"
}