📅 Original date posted:2023-06-03
🗒️ Summary of this message: A discussion on the incentive compatibility of a malleated wtxid with annex data stuffed to max transaction size, and the possibility of reviving a proposal to limit the annex.
📝 Original message:
On Sat, Jun 3, 2023 at 2:43 PM Greg Sanders <gsanders87 at gmail.com> wrote:
> No in this case the txid is identical. Only the wtxid is malleated, with
> annex data stuffed to max transaction size.
>
This doesn't sound incentive compatible? While gathering context, I did
find https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24007. Apparently closed
because of a lack of use case. But perhaps the desire to not limit the
annex can revive that proposal?
Joost
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20230603/a01c286a/attachment-0001.html>;
Joost Jager [ARCHIVE] /
npub1as…wfqmx
2023-06-19 18:19:53
in reply to nevent1q…nsew
Author Public Key
npub1aslmpzentw224n3s6yccru4dq2qdlx7rfudfnqevfck637cjt6esswfqmxPublished at
2023-06-19 18:19:53Event JSON
{
"id": "f21ebd34d38721f0f3fb8411b0b3367b2e974e9006f028bf231eac371128768f",
"pubkey": "ec3fb08b335b94aace30d13181f2ad0280df9bc34f1a99832c4e2da8fb125eb3",
"created_at": 1687198793,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"68ea5a0105a7a492dce97362b0bd66bf00dac11bf2874dff55cd731b6f35e825",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"fe8bfbc0c7a33443a8638205187fe56dbbc99b385a600ad45cb788338374e938",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"937f10fc4f78d8676348562d9d886843fbb351d99d6c96423fe9970819962e19"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2023-06-03\n🗒️ Summary of this message: A discussion on the incentive compatibility of a malleated wtxid with annex data stuffed to max transaction size, and the possibility of reviving a proposal to limit the annex.\n📝 Original message:\nOn Sat, Jun 3, 2023 at 2:43 PM Greg Sanders \u003cgsanders87 at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e No in this case the txid is identical. Only the wtxid is malleated, with\n\u003e annex data stuffed to max transaction size.\n\u003e\n\nThis doesn't sound incentive compatible? While gathering context, I did\nfind https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24007. Apparently closed\nbecause of a lack of use case. But perhaps the desire to not limit the\nannex can revive that proposal?\n\nJoost\n\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20230603/a01c286a/attachment-0001.html\u003e",
"sig": "38459ba5811caef7b96042f153f44ce416d776fc9ae896a6198980a8501cfb4bc2ca51c3168f2b0882737ed4afbf7d0c12eba8002caebe80aa79f456d246707e"
}