š
Original date posted:2014-05-03
š Original message:I don't think such a pull request would be accepted. The point was to
minimize impact to the block chain. Each extras txout adds 9 bytes
minimum, with zero benefit over serializing the data together in a
single OP_RETURN.
On 05/03/2014 11:39 AM, Peter Todd wrote:
> The standard format ended up being exactly:
>
> OP_RETURN <0 to 40-byte PUSHDATA>
>
> You've split the data across two PUSHDATA's. The standard should have let the data be split up like that; pull requests accepted.
>
Mark Friedenbach [ARCHIVE] /
npub1r3ā¦48d0u
2023-06-07 15:20:54
in reply to nevent1qā¦348z
Author Public Key
npub1r3san9v5njl6798hvauyu9ntm6r9c7u8s0t65wls58gpfdcvqp5sa48d0uPublished at
2023-06-07 15:20:54Event JSON
{
"id": "f268f60bbfc96d6e44089287f413efa18f7a7e9c4507b4c79ac3e4588deb3438",
"pubkey": "1c61d995949cbfaf14f767784e166bde865c7b8783d7aa3bf0a1d014b70c0069",
"created_at": 1686151254,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"16e41fd8d1a66d26890ffeb755f22e3a8eb1c8b9debfb4782bf4946f5773a9bc",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"aed5c932eccb5cd3391c9dc319288d1af5ae62f96bced0911c29aa1fdb326b11",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa"
]
],
"content": "š
Original date posted:2014-05-03\nš Original message:I don't think such a pull request would be accepted. The point was to\nminimize impact to the block chain. Each extras txout adds 9 bytes\nminimum, with zero benefit over serializing the data together in a\nsingle OP_RETURN.\n\nOn 05/03/2014 11:39 AM, Peter Todd wrote:\n\u003e The standard format ended up being exactly:\n\u003e \n\u003e OP_RETURN \u003c0 to 40-byte PUSHDATA\u003e\n\u003e \n\u003e You've split the data across two PUSHDATA's. The standard should have let the data be split up like that; pull requests accepted.\n\u003e",
"sig": "23b567a51be371ea0dd7ca2d6a882808277bb5b18e9e3140b1411935c02fa059f6205bce5988fc717134c6d3dc1e52053e7956d8e71ae0f27e39d4b3d0eac995"
}