📅 Original date posted:2014-08-08
📝 Original message:On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 7:59 AM, Wladimir <laanwj at gmail.com> wrote:
> Bitcoind would need a local interprocess message bus for that, and
> would need to act as router for messages from/to the P2P network.
> ZeroMQ seems like a good choice for that. That's not completely crazy
> as there are already plans to add zeromq as an optional dependency for
> notifications [1].
Generally agreed, though for ZMQ it is a bit different than a P2P service.
IMO, ZMQ really wants to be a plug-in that registers some internal
signals. It wants to capture the precise points where a block was
accepted internally. PR #4599 tries to lead by example:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/4599
A P2P service would be a slightly different sort of plug-in.
--
Jeff Garzik
Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist
BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/
Jeff Garzik [ARCHIVE] /
npub1kf…f3f58
2023-06-07 15:25:05
in reply to nevent1q…jcy8
Author Public Key
npub1kf0ppcjaguxekg24yx6smgxlu73qn0k8lm0t2wrqc0scpl7u3sgsmf3f58Published at
2023-06-07 15:25:05Event JSON
{
"id": "f676c8d34d704e441cfb0ca9767734f1f08993eb6581051cf26bf589f53387fb",
"pubkey": "b25e10e25d470d9b215521b50da0dfe7a209bec7fedeb53860c3e180ffdc8c11",
"created_at": 1686151505,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"1469c70b65b3d566e17429f93d31db1fc95b8cc6ebff3a3c5370afa0b4c5b71b",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"47e447ebd61a59064c1a55c383d1a76b06ea71aa4da3e5d69a121a2f90fd88ee",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"b25e10e25d470d9b215521b50da0dfe7a209bec7fedeb53860c3e180ffdc8c11"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2014-08-08\n📝 Original message:On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 7:59 AM, Wladimir \u003claanwj at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\u003e Bitcoind would need a local interprocess message bus for that, and\n\u003e would need to act as router for messages from/to the P2P network.\n\u003e ZeroMQ seems like a good choice for that. That's not completely crazy\n\u003e as there are already plans to add zeromq as an optional dependency for\n\u003e notifications [1].\n\nGenerally agreed, though for ZMQ it is a bit different than a P2P service.\n\nIMO, ZMQ really wants to be a plug-in that registers some internal\nsignals. It wants to capture the precise points where a block was\naccepted internally. PR #4599 tries to lead by example:\nhttps://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/4599\n\nA P2P service would be a slightly different sort of plug-in.\n\n-- \nJeff Garzik\nBitcoin core developer and open source evangelist\nBitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/",
"sig": "244959a54ca2d8bdcc86c3c66f6701c022e16d57f10d14bd142b2497f1544b25eb46695db6a08dd64ede8f35ab2885282234332efc2f3f75af27bfcb31f766cb"
}