📅 Original date posted:2016-02-07
📝 Original message:On Feb 6, 2016, at 9:21 PM, Jannes Faber via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> They *must* be able to send their customers both coins as separate withdrawals.
>
Supporting the obsolete chain is unnecessary. Such support has not been offered in any cryptocurrency hard fork before, as far as I know. I do not see why it should start now.
> If not, that amounts to theft of their customers funds.
>
If they announce their planned behavior before the fork, I do not see any ethical or legal issues.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20160207/e4c61e53/attachment.html>;
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20160207/e4c61e53/attachment.sig>;
Jonathan Toomim [ARCHIVE] /
npub1pl…yj0hj
2023-06-07 17:48:47
in reply to nevent1q…9qhy
Author Public Key
npub1pl6kcz00s7wgn6syh73dta0qm9sqpmtw4adv8rnm2w9fmynkw45sayj0hjPublished at
2023-06-07 17:48:47Event JSON
{
"id": "f878d71071e38f568b32d08f2bd098ea79a7f807b6205db0b4a728c73de4be01",
"pubkey": "0ff56c09ef879c89ea04bfa2d5f5e0d96000ed6eaf5ac38e7b538a9d92767569",
"created_at": 1686160127,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"299dc342b2928a854d3cdebebdfa1b5d7d113553560926ba6670328be5b1c1ce",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"dddad0cf7583b82448686d817c4183558f1ee14cab558dfdff551cf6b98984f5",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"f05699fae959fb582a8bd56a55b613bafd61c2c239a00bc5ea66faf0cb7a2aa8"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2016-02-07\n📝 Original message:On Feb 6, 2016, at 9:21 PM, Jannes Faber via bitcoin-dev \u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e They *must* be able to send their customers both coins as separate withdrawals.\n\u003e \nSupporting the obsolete chain is unnecessary. Such support has not been offered in any cryptocurrency hard fork before, as far as I know. I do not see why it should start now.\n\u003e If not, that amounts to theft of their customers funds.\n\u003e \nIf they announce their planned behavior before the fork, I do not see any ethical or legal issues.\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20160207/e4c61e53/attachment.html\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 496 bytes\nDesc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20160207/e4c61e53/attachment.sig\u003e",
"sig": "41ccde86b18bdfc84a1eba746a8aa61a9337380fd03a461f49fe4bd8541e7a1d7c08108d1f1adede8507a13bbdc7e5cbc8431cc35b2fe3e9b32e16d819476518"
}