Russell O'Connor [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2016-10-02 📝 Original message:> I don't know if it's ...
📅 Original date posted:2016-10-02
📝 Original message:> I don't know if it's possible to implement decentralised sidechains without
> "breaking" this rule.
>
I haven't really been following the sidechain developements, but my
understanding was that redemption from a side chain would be two phase.
The person unpegging the funds provides a proof that they have locked the
funds on the side chain and are eligible to withdraw the funds, plus they
put up a bounty. Then there is a time-locked period where others can
collect the bounty by providing a fraud proof, that the locked funds given
in the proof have actually been double spent. This two phase system
doesn't violate this rule.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <
http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20161002/78830f94/attachment.html>
Published at
2023-06-07 17:53:43Event JSON
{
"id": "f01bddf3a268c3ce0c63365eb21ad7efcdfc200af88eaa0c8d36ac3412154e8a",
"pubkey": "6b8e77368804013d7126ba4b77c7963bcfeff909135791531097d7a0f03ca85d",
"created_at": 1686160423,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"a0719e105373a31b19331be2ab9915ba509ea0ec8469edd3808978e2d85d8297",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"037631359ff5e060ff5469aa2e4de14777ee6882a49786a63b1ebc3fb611909a",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"4b38603408f5be002091210e869a4ca86fc2aa1ffd0871036a0668068ee626ee"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2016-10-02\n📝 Original message:\u003e I don't know if it's possible to implement decentralised sidechains without\n\u003e \"breaking\" this rule.\n\u003e\n\nI haven't really been following the sidechain developements, but my\nunderstanding was that redemption from a side chain would be two phase.\nThe person unpegging the funds provides a proof that they have locked the\nfunds on the side chain and are eligible to withdraw the funds, plus they\nput up a bounty. Then there is a time-locked period where others can\ncollect the bounty by providing a fraud proof, that the locked funds given\nin the proof have actually been double spent. This two phase system\ndoesn't violate this rule.\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20161002/78830f94/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "153f70b382baf89fcb581eb6e9e7c3b0c2179355129963b0df36d20db982f7983025371dcbf3848c39c1f836edf4d9db88e094e2d2376a491513ee147cc223ce"
}