jimmysong on Nostr: Update: There have been 11700 transactions since block 894289 that have had OP_RETURN ...
Update:
There have been 11700 transactions since block 894289 that have had OP_RETURN size > 83. This is way more than the 30 from the first 4 months and it's probably because of @oomahq
's challenge to make the non-standard OP_RETURNs more than 50% of the total OP_RETURNs.
Running the numbers on these, here are the fee rates that they paid compared to the median fee rate.
On average the 11700 transactions paid 191% more than the median fee rates of the blocks in which they were included. Or put another way, these transactions paid a bit less than triple the median fee rate.
1336 paid less than the median fee rate
2197 paid between the median and 50% more than the median fee rate
3516 paid between 1.5x-2.5x the median fee rate
1554 paid between 2.5x-3.5x the median fee rate
3094 paid more than the 3.5x the median fee rate
1064 were mined by F2Pool
10636 were mined by MARA Pool
You can look at all the transactions in the spreadsheet I put together:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/19c7xOw-8UasQQkyU0EjJo_CuJRLjyu3Z84IrZPpePxI/edit?usp=sharingPublished at
2025-05-13 15:55:00Event JSON
{
"id": "f0b644f302a05051fa8c6a90c897a9dc6285059015a7465604ea8ce896ae3f59",
"pubkey": "7b3f7803750746f455413a221f80965eecb69ef308f2ead1da89cc2c8912e968",
"created_at": 1747151700,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"r",
"wss://bitcoiner.social/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://nos.lol/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://nostr-pub.wellorder.net/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://nostr.bitcoiner.social/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://nostr.mom/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://nostr.oxtr.dev/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://relay.damus.io/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://relay.noderunners.network/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://relay.primal.net/"
]
],
"content": "Update:\n\nThere have been 11700 transactions since block 894289 that have had OP_RETURN size \u003e 83. This is way more than the 30 from the first 4 months and it's probably because of @oomahq\n's challenge to make the non-standard OP_RETURNs more than 50% of the total OP_RETURNs.\n\nRunning the numbers on these, here are the fee rates that they paid compared to the median fee rate.\n\nOn average the 11700 transactions paid 191% more than the median fee rates of the blocks in which they were included. Or put another way, these transactions paid a bit less than triple the median fee rate.\n\n1336 paid less than the median fee rate\n2197 paid between the median and 50% more than the median fee rate\n3516 paid between 1.5x-2.5x the median fee rate\n1554 paid between 2.5x-3.5x the median fee rate\n3094 paid more than the 3.5x the median fee rate\n\n1064 were mined by F2Pool\n10636 were mined by MARA Pool\n\nYou can look at all the transactions in the spreadsheet I put together: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/19c7xOw-8UasQQkyU0EjJo_CuJRLjyu3Z84IrZPpePxI/edit?usp=sharing",
"sig": "ae080abc9a4ec707d393fb6df88ceb424e3749c2d618b5f667da027f30f6aa2e9a9495fefe41a0930cab3ecf1a5d49e9a60fbcb70a8120b31086460c34779e49"
}