Unpopular opinion: every hundred sats should be 1 BTC. It's much easier to reason about it. Because you don't buy a cappuccino for 650 cents, you buy it for $6.50.
Having huge numbers sounds weird when buying cheap items, it gives me Weimar vibes.
Also, good luck explaining to people 1 BTC has 100M sats and expecting them to understand it.
Fundamentally, nothing has to change on the base layer, just the clients would have to adopt this to make it transparent to users.
Fernando Porazzi /
npub1wh…fljgh
2023-11-24 09:01:20
Author Public Key
npub1wh30wunfpkezx5s7edqu9g0s0raeetf5dgthzm0zw7sk8wqygmjqqfljghPublished at
2023-11-24 09:01:20Event JSON
{
"id": "f99886c872430241595ce646277d41b9123779e0ad41a3c1250db6a11edbaae9",
"pubkey": "75e2f772690db223521ecb41c2a1f078fb9cad346a17716de277a163b80446e4",
"created_at": 1700816480,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"t",
"bitcoin"
],
[
"t",
"sats"
],
[
"t",
"orangecoingood"
]
],
"content": "Unpopular opinion: every hundred sats should be 1 BTC. It's much easier to reason about it. Because you don't buy a cappuccino for 650 cents, you buy it for $6.50. \n\nHaving huge numbers sounds weird when buying cheap items, it gives me Weimar vibes.\n\nAlso, good luck explaining to people 1 BTC has 100M sats and expecting them to understand it.\n\nFundamentally, nothing has to change on the base layer, just the clients would have to adopt this to make it transparent to users.",
"sig": "100b2bdb806cc329f587eea0ab81f52933c7cf14b3bdd55a2d140ccdcf3c3d9c70f6e972dffb1f169e30657b4aacae69bc5e626a5297252761681f9d523973fb"
}