It seems like quite a jump to say that the current regs that they’ve spent a ton of time building don’t have such a requirement but but they’re definitely gonna add it? Do you know something the rest of us don’t?
More generally, the push should be that there’s no way to practically verify, and exchanges instead should get users to agree and then do risk based analysis, not push users into a nuts protocol.
matt / Matt Corallo
npub185…swrdp
2023-04-22 14:23:49
in reply to nevent1q…mnxz
Author Public Key
npub185h9z5yxn8uc7retm0n6gkm88358lejzparxms5kmy9epr236k2qcswrdpPublished at
2023-04-22 14:23:49Event JSON
{
"id": "f9e9cd6ad26ffe21e6c3be8fbe0cb5ab2d44b19d98a4c7e7e1d8ac0986137f17",
"pubkey": "3d2e51508699f98f0f2bdbe7a45b673c687fe6420f466dc296d90b908d51d594",
"created_at": 1682173429,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"c3b5fae81833160f52553c443da7edf308f4f59a41dd6ef4150b9f0baaddee13"
],
[
"e",
"0d98baa97226209f9e3c82ea834d0e5b6704389ef7ed398d12cf40ae709be449"
],
[
"p",
"f00ae576528b2a9845e7a82c63f67bd96f1fcb5fa7070b3c989f3d1a8b429b52"
],
[
"p",
"90048dc83a62bcd7ac64cbbb91175b4dce0fc6a72bae12b610368e40eec208d4"
],
[
"p",
"276dbf1210c9344548dcf8fc826958e97cfa871f9824e11b60cac04076ab2fb8"
]
],
"content": "It seems like quite a jump to say that the current regs that they’ve spent a ton of time building don’t have such a requirement but but they’re definitely gonna add it? Do you know something the rest of us don’t?\n\nMore generally, the push should be that there’s no way to practically verify, and exchanges instead should get users to agree and then do risk based analysis, not push users into a nuts protocol. ",
"sig": "b6bbf1ef16076ef55b7626426e2fa25f61dfbe20dfcffc48f041c5da35948abbd536839d5d776a03149db2df6140a9c52e30b859ceb9efda18b4de6817cf100f"
}