supermassive on Nostr: I guess we just disagree on the approach, either way thank you for actually engaging ...

I guess we just disagree on the approach, either way thank you for actually engaging with me on this discussion, it’s been hard.

for me, this indicates the extreme nascency of the monetary network, and it also ties into misconceptions about bitcoin’s trajectory and purpose.

the sub-1k sat utxos (I am guessing) are probably mostly due to actual transactions of this size being sent around since inception? the actual amount and rate of increase which comes from data anchoring is a fraction. (total utxo bloat is a different story, but if most of that is coming from standardized shitcoining doesn’t it negate the entire argument of aligning incentives?)

altering standardness in anticipation of further growth in non-standard outputs is putting the cart before the horse.