📅 Original date posted:2015-02-19
📝 Original message:On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 06:13:06PM +0100, Tamas Blummer wrote:
>
> On Feb 15, 2015, at 6:02 PM, Peter Todd <pete at petertodd.org> wrote:
> > Yes you are dicking around.
>
> I thought I was clear, that I am using Bitcoin Core as border router talking to its P2P interface.
>
> The reimplementation of consensus code helped me to deeply understand the protocol, aids debugging
> and now comes handy to create a side chain.
The work that Tamas did re-implementing is probably one of the most valuable
things he ever did.
It would significantly improve the quality of the consensus code if this
community would start treating it as a buggy & poorly defined proof-of-concept
that just happens to actually run, rather than some holy scripture upon which
we must never question (or change)
I'm impressed by the secp256k1 work, and other modularity efforts, but at
some point main.cpp needs to get untangled, and have some critical review
if bitcoin wants to remain relevant.
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Troy Benjegerdes 'da hozer' hozer at hozed.org
Troy Benjegerdes [ARCHIVE] /
npub1m6…rdjn5
2023-06-07 15:30:36
in reply to nevent1q…uprx
Author Public Key
npub1m6p5kgcd428x6pxyfege98zjmlwrdhp0gyz6pdnsvrvalscddnxqurdjn5Published at
2023-06-07 15:30:36Event JSON
{
"id": "fb482fb9490df43b544faee0b166ebf083cfc01d56917c8abe59b1196736e47e",
"pubkey": "de834b230daa8e6d04c44e51929c52dfdc36dc2f4105a0b67060d9dfc30d6ccc",
"created_at": 1686151836,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"a1e27a9e8f5d88bf32b6a112984bbe10158121e645475e7be21e08ccaa36e778",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"3d2a15217c242e406cf0682ece37cb3234a268e8d994648f4ea17d30133bbf57",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"15d1f01f6131919ed14372950f43c39243ea876a95597aa9b2701a7295d99aaf"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-02-19\n📝 Original message:On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 06:13:06PM +0100, Tamas Blummer wrote:\n\u003e \n\u003e On Feb 15, 2015, at 6:02 PM, Peter Todd \u003cpete at petertodd.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e \u003e Yes you are dicking around.\n\u003e \n\u003e I thought I was clear, that I am using Bitcoin Core as border router talking to its P2P interface.\n\u003e \n\u003e The reimplementation of consensus code helped me to deeply understand the protocol, aids debugging\n\u003e and now comes handy to create a side chain.\n\nThe work that Tamas did re-implementing is probably one of the most valuable\nthings he ever did.\n\nIt would significantly improve the quality of the consensus code if this\ncommunity would start treating it as a buggy \u0026 poorly defined proof-of-concept\nthat just happens to actually run, rather than some holy scripture upon which\nwe must never question (or change)\n\nI'm impressed by the secp256k1 work, and other modularity efforts, but at \nsome point main.cpp needs to get untangled, and have some critical review\nif bitcoin wants to remain relevant.\n\n-- \n----------------------------------------------------------------------------\nTroy Benjegerdes 'da hozer' hozer at hozed.org",
"sig": "c70df49ed50aaca2c8c6a3c84bcb080b3bddb8ed7996d5e9ba130405e38f42514ca8a149e49402618bfe10ff6dd7e7431470058bcf482094199d2d8d5811fc0e"
}