📅 Original date posted:2014-10-16
📝 Original message:On Wednesday, October 15, 2014 8:47:18 AM Wladimir wrote:
> These BIPs should go to Final state - they are implemented all over
> the place, and are thus entirely fixed in place now. Any changes would
> require a new BIP as amandment:
>
> - BIP 14 (BIP Protocol Version and User Agent)
ACK
> - BIP 21 (URI Scheme)
ACK
> - BIP 22 (getblocktemplate - Fundamentals)
ACK
> - BIP 31 (Pong Message)
ACK
> - BIP 34 (Block v2, Height in coinbase)
ACK
> - BIP 35 (mempool message)
ACK
> - BIP 37 (Bloom filtering)
>
> Let me know if you (don't) agree.
Shouldn't we be doing this in a GitHub PR rather than spamming up the ML?
Luke
Luke Dashjr [ARCHIVE] /
npub1tf…rfq0n
2023-06-07 15:26:34
in reply to nevent1q…rcth
Author Public Key
npub1tfk373zg9dnmtvxnpnq7s2dkdgj37rwfj3yrwld7830qltmv8qps8rfq0nPublished at
2023-06-07 15:26:34Event JSON
{
"id": "f928bab3b60281e866ca53685f085ad9926a5eb673b90f941dd861fced6827e0",
"pubkey": "5a6d1f44482b67b5b0d30cc1e829b66a251f0dc99448377dbe3c5e0faf6c3803",
"created_at": 1686151594,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"4009e9af413bb92ae5be8b1ef98981b27c2a69fbe6449bb4c9c66d849b19b234",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"f34cc57a538622d3ef3e5a60e203a1850c71f0be6dfc6f00c4a4e4cfdcb85f6e",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"cd753aa8fbc112e14ffe9fe09d3630f0eff76ca68e376e004b8e77b687adddba"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2014-10-16\n📝 Original message:On Wednesday, October 15, 2014 8:47:18 AM Wladimir wrote:\n\u003e These BIPs should go to Final state - they are implemented all over\n\u003e the place, and are thus entirely fixed in place now. Any changes would\n\u003e require a new BIP as amandment:\n\u003e \n\u003e - BIP 14 (BIP Protocol Version and User Agent)\n\nACK\n\n\u003e - BIP 21 (URI Scheme)\n\nACK\n\n\u003e - BIP 22 (getblocktemplate - Fundamentals)\n\nACK\n\n\u003e - BIP 31 (Pong Message)\n\nACK\n\n\u003e - BIP 34 (Block v2, Height in coinbase)\n\nACK\n\n\u003e - BIP 35 (mempool message)\n\nACK\n\n\u003e - BIP 37 (Bloom filtering)\n\u003e \n\u003e Let me know if you (don't) agree.\n\nShouldn't we be doing this in a GitHub PR rather than spamming up the ML?\n\nLuke",
"sig": "955968ae58a745702bce1e0f05980beb497e22278c5569f1f80b62159b6f89d0aa3b0b43950622fb34a9b1b66f49dfb6ba35b1711fda088eab35cdf5ac67c7dd"
}