Why Nostr? What is Njump?
2023-06-09 12:53:03
in reply to

David A. Harding [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2018-11-25 📝 Original message: On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at ...

📅 Original date posted:2018-11-25
📝 Original message:
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 12:47:17PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> I'm also starting to implement this, to see what I missed!
>
> - Feerate is fixed at 253 [satoshis per 1,000 weight]

IIUC, this is just over Bitcoin Core's default minimum relay fee of
0.00001000 BTC/vByte. That works right now, as mempools are nowhere
near full, but if they fill up again and the BIP133 feefilters are
increased by any amount, nodes will no longer relay transactions with
minimum feerates.

In that case, how does the commitment transaction get relayed in order
for its `to_*_pushme` outputs to be spent for CPFP fee bumping?[1]

There's currently some text in the PR about using
sighash_single|sighash_anyonecanpay for use with RBF, but I don't think
that can apply to spending the commitment transaction, as that would
allow not just adding new inputs and outputs, but also removing all but
the 'singled' output (allowing theft of its value).

-Dave

[1] I don't think Bitcoin Core currently relays transaction packages
consisting of parents below the relay fee limit and children
sufficiently above the limit to pay for their parents. This has
certainly been discussed, so maybe I'm wrong and it is available or
maybe it'll be available in the future.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20181125/c4adf28a/attachment.sig>;
Author Public Key
npub16dt55fpq3a8r6zpphd9xngxr46zzqs75gna9cj5vf8pknyv2d7equx4wrd