📅 Original date posted:2018-06-21
📝 Original message:On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 7:56 PM, Peter D. Gray via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> PSBT is something we need, and has been missing from the ecosystem
> for a long time. Let's push this out and start talking about future
> versions after we learn from this one.
When you implement proposals that have little to no public discussion
about them you take the risk that your work needs to be changed when
other people do actually begin reviewing the work. It is incredibly
demoralizing as a designer and a reviewer to have proposals that were
put out for discussion show up implemented in things with these vested
interests then insisting that they not be refined further. I think
kind of handling is toxic to performing development in public.
Although it's silly enough that it won't happen, I think our industry
would be better off if there was a social norm that anytime someone
insists an unfinished proposal shouldn't be changed because they
already implemented it that the spec should _always_ be changed, in
order to discourage further instances of that conduct.
Gregory Maxwell [ARCHIVE] /
npub1f2…crwet
2023-06-07 18:13:09
in reply to nevent1q…cfg9
Author Public Key
npub1f2nvlx49er5c7sqa43src6ssyp6snd4qwvtkwm5avc2l84cs84esecrwetPublished at
2023-06-07 18:13:09Event JSON
{
"id": "f46351424515f8608d675918f68bc053397a4d9cec3b15077cd0b21b7af2c84d",
"pubkey": "4aa6cf9aa5c8e98f401dac603c6a10207509b6a07317676e9d6615f3d7103d73",
"created_at": 1686161589,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"cde3c2f1af5ec4e3200e32c7fdbcba54b58741a9d65d38dd383e78325ee0ffcd",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"390e987cceb67f609a15e3fa01a02f158dac6d4833ce6177f8b5316a46affcf6",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"7b004e1cd14bfe95aec539b0a3843c2713d155a939abd807a5714c2a09f484c4"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2018-06-21\n📝 Original message:On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 7:56 PM, Peter D. Gray via bitcoin-dev\n\u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e PSBT is something we need, and has been missing from the ecosystem\n\u003e for a long time. Let's push this out and start talking about future\n\u003e versions after we learn from this one.\n\nWhen you implement proposals that have little to no public discussion\nabout them you take the risk that your work needs to be changed when\nother people do actually begin reviewing the work. It is incredibly\ndemoralizing as a designer and a reviewer to have proposals that were\nput out for discussion show up implemented in things with these vested\ninterests then insisting that they not be refined further. I think\nkind of handling is toxic to performing development in public.\n\nAlthough it's silly enough that it won't happen, I think our industry\nwould be better off if there was a social norm that anytime someone\ninsists an unfinished proposal shouldn't be changed because they\nalready implemented it that the spec should _always_ be changed, in\norder to discourage further instances of that conduct.",
"sig": "0bbcca211845fe0491f5c1bcbda0a9bc43d6d04e7ee0aabf940816c0c1adf11c2f43b08da3906e9679cf0d9d5be09fd98ccf0c3beb7c6f1b181b9fe210bda58e"
}