Wladimir J. van der Laan [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-08-24 📝 Original message:> NODE_BLOOM is distinct ...
📅 Original date posted:2015-08-24
📝 Original message:> NODE_BLOOM is distinct from NODE_NETWORK, and it is legal to advertise
> NODE_BLOOM but not NODE_NETWORK (eg for nodes running in pruned mode
> which, nonetheless, provide filtered access to the data which they do have).
But is this useful without having decided on a way to signal which blocks pruned nodes do have?
It looks like the part between paranthesis is speculation and should be left to a future BIP.
Wladimir
Published at
2023-06-07 17:37:39Event JSON
{
"id": "f4ad4c24a3963973390b61bb216b95d9f9bdd12c0e122b4d23eefc7b2ffa92f8",
"pubkey": "5c0b7fca51fd4830b4d9f840de063faebeeabd3bb5dd118de9cdf50a6feaaf98",
"created_at": 1686159459,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"24b0a1bf3dfc9fc9f3f6739b5fab50dd1ce2799fc8ef26378cae8652e75e5fc8",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"4b8f568e12faaf26a8d54fc42394bab055793c546341d61d89132f2a976112dc",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"cd753aa8fbc112e14ffe9fe09d3630f0eff76ca68e376e004b8e77b687adddba"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-08-24\n📝 Original message:\u003e NODE_BLOOM is distinct from NODE_NETWORK, and it is legal to advertise\n\u003e NODE_BLOOM but not NODE_NETWORK (eg for nodes running in pruned mode\n\u003e which, nonetheless, provide filtered access to the data which they do have).\n\nBut is this useful without having decided on a way to signal which blocks pruned nodes do have?\n\nIt looks like the part between paranthesis is speculation and should be left to a future BIP. \n\nWladimir",
"sig": "6bdb6f0b171e7231cba3a5470c70afb033e84af06230fec5d836432a7af833fe28da3a83e15f3012179b275818375ddaad9b330dc2df783b211dcad48596c280"
}