📅 Original date posted:2014-04-23
📝 Original message:On 23.04.2014, at 22:02, Luke-Jr <luke at dashjr.org> wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 23, 2014 8:01:16 PM Tamas Blummer wrote:
>> On 23.04.2014, at 21:55, Luke-Jr <luke at dashjr.org> wrote:
>>> Any wallet should import all the coins just fine, it just wouldn't *use*
>>> any account other than 0. Remember addresses are used to receive
>>> bitcoins; once the UTXOs are in the wallet, they are no longer
>>> associated with the address or any other details of how they were
>>> received.
>>
>> This is a bit idealistic.
>> The wallet has to know how it got the UTXO in order to be able to spend it.
>
> No it doesn't... Just the assigned scriptPubKey and secret(s) required to
> satisfy it.
>
To know the secret it needs to know which key coordinate to use that is logically the same as knowing the address it used to receive it.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140423/5bc05ae4/attachment.sig>;
Tamas Blummer [ARCHIVE] /
npub1cc…ex8m8
2023-06-07 15:18:03
in reply to nevent1q…4z9v
Author Public Key
npub1ccegg9n9lnx6huppxg43m95488yur7pfemkn3pz0agjws5ffvtts0ex8m8Published at
2023-06-07 15:18:03Event JSON
{
"id": "f4fc405d876e48732e83f62190ba429999a28b4f4564ccadc2ab7c98151c4151",
"pubkey": "c632841665fccdabf021322b1d969539c9c1f829ceed38844fea24e8512962d7",
"created_at": 1686151083,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"3d6a81230db6ab232d8356d3ea7e609f18aff1b8f11502ea70755e81b0de88f9",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"9e6472ed65cf534b70383661fe2bebc7de7ef97b01618560c5673b13f080dda1",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"6ac6a519b554d8ff726a301e3daec0b489f443793778feccc6ea7a536f7354f1"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2014-04-23\n📝 Original message:On 23.04.2014, at 22:02, Luke-Jr \u003cluke at dashjr.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e On Wednesday, April 23, 2014 8:01:16 PM Tamas Blummer wrote:\n\u003e\u003e On 23.04.2014, at 21:55, Luke-Jr \u003cluke at dashjr.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\u003e\u003e Any wallet should import all the coins just fine, it just wouldn't *use*\n\u003e\u003e\u003e any account other than 0. Remember addresses are used to receive\n\u003e\u003e\u003e bitcoins; once the UTXOs are in the wallet, they are no longer\n\u003e\u003e\u003e associated with the address or any other details of how they were\n\u003e\u003e\u003e received.\n\u003e\u003e \n\u003e\u003e This is a bit idealistic.\n\u003e\u003e The wallet has to know how it got the UTXO in order to be able to spend it.\n\u003e \n\u003e No it doesn't... Just the assigned scriptPubKey and secret(s) required to \n\u003e satisfy it.\n\u003e \n\nTo know the secret it needs to know which key coordinate to use that is logically the same as knowing the address it used to receive it.\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 495 bytes\nDesc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140423/5bc05ae4/attachment.sig\u003e",
"sig": "94288895d73891275f5e5509b89339d373c309b530ea2e3ecc515cab551f02d4eba4eb45233c9d899bcbd2db074f184c29126a9df1384e09e8618d8deaaf98fd"
}