📅 Original date posted:2012-11-27
📝 Original message:> That hash would then be reported via some secure channel outside of bitcoin's
> domain.
OK, I see. I guess that could be a reasonable fallback for the case
where you have a secure channel.
> I don't understand what the relevance of multi-factor is to invoices?
Yes, exactly. It's about paying who you think you're paying (when you
confirm on a second uncompromised device).
Mike Hearn [ARCHIVE] /
npub17t…4qgyd
2023-06-07 10:41:29
in reply to nevent1q…ukdw
Author Public Key
npub17ty4mumkv43w8wtt0xsz2jypck0gvw0j8xrcg6tpea25z2nh7meqf4qgydPublished at
2023-06-07 10:41:29Event JSON
{
"id": "fc6427fb97f4003e0c4bd1d04daa518d6af3793c5f7d4ff05798965d6074dacb",
"pubkey": "f2c95df3766562e3b96b79a0254881c59e8639f23987846961cf55412a77f6f2",
"created_at": 1686134489,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"f5f2400f8aa8a7067be3d080f096fd7cbfeecdd6e589c178b85b63a9338150a5",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"fa131e6ee717be555ded574c8f27ed5ef12b9fd15be9a7895e7a7bc47e9c8a37",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"99bec497728c848e65549d1a5257d08de97621edcb4b77073269a45dac708d59"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2012-11-27\n📝 Original message:\u003e That hash would then be reported via some secure channel outside of bitcoin's\n\u003e domain.\n\nOK, I see. I guess that could be a reasonable fallback for the case\nwhere you have a secure channel.\n\n\u003e I don't understand what the relevance of multi-factor is to invoices?\n\nYes, exactly. It's about paying who you think you're paying (when you\nconfirm on a second uncompromised device).",
"sig": "073d18163d1a244a535187d6f08c00eba4ac0f5179ee46661a60a2109d941a42ac093dd91e390bbaeaaf13a82d6bb6986aa4c003a48c57b0125fcfbf71e81c9a"
}