This is a bit speculative:
I don't think Sowell, Friedman or Hayek will find much acceptance by the wider Tamil populace even if they're translated.
Mises would, if explained well. It's tough. But praxeology, methodological individualism would require a mastery of Tamil.
Hoppe, maybe. Also tough. Kantian ideas and argumentation ethics are a challenge. Will have to go through Tamil philosophy in depth.
But Rothbard. Boy would HE be accepted readily.
Austrian Revivalist
npub1zg…lqdq2
2025-03-17 18:35:12
Author Public Key
npub1zgmrm4ug79nkqlyxgjy6m982e3enzc8zlnr5u5035g8tlhruj7ms9lqdq2Published at
2025-03-17 18:35:12Event JSON
{
"id": "f399782c0854a19eaf05d92ef91559cc5f6a32fa5d520baa8bebedf0542b8ef8",
"pubkey": "12363dd788f167607c864489ad94eacc733160e2fcc74e51f1a20ebfdc7c97b7",
"created_at": 1742236512,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [],
"content": "This is a bit speculative: \n\nI don't think Sowell, Friedman or Hayek will find much acceptance by the wider Tamil populace even if they're translated.\n\nMises would, if explained well. It's tough. But praxeology, methodological individualism would require a mastery of Tamil.\n\nHoppe, maybe. Also tough. Kantian ideas and argumentation ethics are a challenge. Will have to go through Tamil philosophy in depth.\n\n\nBut Rothbard. Boy would HE be accepted readily.",
"sig": "cbc5a53d35a474fc90f90a8449b374a25aac214a4a376f4f7af1aa5159725429ca890fa4fb162264d41085bd4305c0058f12ee69daf16a3c5e9de78759d541a5"
}