Why Nostr? What is Njump?
2025-05-02 19:50:04

jimbocoin on Nostr: Jimbo’s take on the Bitcoin policy/inscription debate: * Witness Data ...

Jimbo’s take on the Bitcoin policy/inscription debate:

* Witness Data (inscriptions): Already prunable! Like OP_RETURN, it avoids permanent data bloat for non-archival nodes.

* Fees/Full Blocks = Success: High fees aren't failure, they mean Bitcoin is in demand. Get used to it if you believe in Bitcoin’s success.

* Market Over Policy: Fee market naturally prices out inefficient uses over time. Let it work. Stop trying to centrally plan block space via Core policy changes.

* Core should be Consensus ONLY: Bitcoin Core should focus exclusively on consensus rules. Stop the bikeshedding over non-consensus policy (like OP_RETURN limits) within Core development.

* Balkanize Policy: Node operators deserve choice! Let them pick mempool/relay policies like Linux distros. Embrace complexity/responsibility as the price of freedom.

* Decentralize More: Block building/template construction (Stratum V2+) also belongs outside Core, just like hashing hardware and wallets.

* Trust Emergent Order: Bitcoin self-regulates via incentives. Stop the central planning hubris; trust individual choices & the protocol's design. Current debates are opportunities to push more functions out of Core.

#Bitcoin
Author Public Key
npub1v9qy0ry6uyh36z65pe790qrxfye84ydsgzc877armmwr2l9tpkjsdx9q3h