provoost on Nostr: I read the guidance a few times and understood it as meaning non-custodial mixers are ...
I read the guidance a few times and understood it as meaning non-custodial mixers are not covered. I had not read the statute itself.
I also read through the DoJ argument here, but at minimum does not seem ridiculous. We'll have to see what a judge makes of it (or I guess a jury?).
Also best to improve the law to make it unambiguously privacy friendly ... good luck with that, then we wouldn't need cryptocurrency in the first place.
Published at
2024-04-27 18:42:22Event JSON
{
"id": "f3a1c732615fb7f29791e8b4c4b7fcdbabf724c887df54b7099160df764552b0",
"pubkey": "8685ebef665338dd6931e2ccdf3c19d9f0e5a1067c918f22e7081c2558f8faf8",
"created_at": 1714243342,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"dd5899760bb3b04f976eddc8e0083d5960bd1b1693c5a788e47634e7f90c0b82"
],
[
"e",
"aaf063eca7df2071335fe95f20e9bb861b88dc6238481ea75a39b9e7a1f67d56"
],
[
"p",
"3d2e51508699f98f0f2bdbe7a45b673c687fe6420f466dc296d90b908d51d594"
]
],
"content": "I read the guidance a few times and understood it as meaning non-custodial mixers are not covered. I had not read the statute itself.\n\nI also read through the DoJ argument here, but at minimum does not seem ridiculous. We'll have to see what a judge makes of it (or I guess a jury?).\n\nAlso best to improve the law to make it unambiguously privacy friendly ... good luck with that, then we wouldn't need cryptocurrency in the first place.",
"sig": "ed46a5ca9ac378fcc07d052f42fcb1189100f3bba1b312c6e04039e21b4eff3b742029d69e2057f87319c64d0ce0c094680b48af5cc65ee656961a32e19a252e"
}