Here is a report generated via Perplexity Pro with Deep Research and a focus on academic sources:
What is the relationship between Bitcoin and human rights
# The Relationship Between Bitcoin and Human Rights: A Multidimensional Analysis
The relationship between Bitcoin and human rights represents one of the most consequential technological and sociopolitical intersections of the 21st century. Emerging in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, Bitcoin introduced a decentralized digital currency system that operates independently of traditional financial institutions[1][3]. Over the past decade, its pseudonymous creator Satoshi Nakamoto's invention has evolved from a cryptographic curiosity into both a technological innovation and a philosophical statement about financial sovereignty[2][5]. This report examines how Bitcoin's technical architecture interacts with fundamental human rights frameworks, analyzing its potential as a tool for financial inclusion, resistance against authoritarianism, and economic empowerment, while also addressing significant concerns regarding energy consumption, regulatory challenges, and potential misuse. Through case studies from Venezuela to Nigeria and analysis of blockchain's immutable properties, we explore how this technology is reshaping the landscape of digital human rights in the contemporary era.
## Bitcoin as a Tool for Financial Inclusion and Economic Empowerment
### Decentralized Architecture and Banking the Unbanked
Bitcoin's decentralized blockchain technology enables peer-to-peer transactions without requiring intermediaries like banks or payment processors[1][4]. This fundamental characteristic has made it particularly valuable for the estimated 1.4 billion adults globally who lack access to traditional banking services[3][7]. In developing nations where banking infrastructure is scarce or unreliable, Bitcoin wallets on mobile devices can provide basic financial services through simple internet connections[5][9]. The World Bank notes that 65% of unbanked adults in Sub-Saharan Africa own mobile phones, creating infrastructure for cryptocurrency adoption even without formal banking relationships[8][12].
El Salvador's 2021 adoption of Bitcoin as legal tender, while controversial, demonstrated how governments might leverage cryptocurrency to reduce remittance costs and increase financial access[10][14]. The country's Chivo wallet system enabled citizens to receive $30 in Bitcoin simply by registering, significantly expanding the financially included population overnight[11][15]. However, technical challenges and price volatility led to mixed results, highlighting both the potential and limitations of such approaches[13][16].
### Protection Against Hyperinflation and Currency Debasement
In economies suffering from hyperinflation like Venezuela and Zimbabwe, Bitcoin has emerged as a store of value alternative to collapsing national currencies[17][19]. During Venezuela's 2018 hyperinflation crisis (peaking at 1.7 million percent annually), Bitcoin trading volume surged as citizens sought to preserve savings[18][21]. While not without risks due to price volatility, cryptocurrency provided an inflation hedge when traditional dollar holdings became inaccessible due to capital controls[20][23]. Similar patterns emerged in Nigeria following the 2020 #EndSARS protests, when the government froze traditional bank accounts of activists, prompting migration to Bitcoin-based financial tools[22][25].
The immutable monetary policy encoded in Bitcoin's protocol—capped supply of 21 million coins and predictable issuance schedule—contrasts sharply with fiat currencies subject to political manipulation[24][26]. This predictable scarcity makes Bitcoin particularly appealing in jurisdictions where central banks engage in aggressive quantitative easing that erodes purchasing power[27][29]. However, critics argue that Bitcoin's deflationary design could create hoarding behavior detrimental to economic growth[28][30].
## Bitcoin as Resistance Against Authoritarian Financial Control
### Circumventing Financial Censorship and Capital Controls
Bitcoin's censorship-resistant properties enable transactions that traditional payment networks might block for political reasons[31][33]. During the 2020 Belarusian protests, activists used Bitcoin to crowdfund initiatives after authorities froze traditional donation channels[32][35]. The blockchain's decentralized nature means no single entity can prevent transactions between wallet addresses, creating what some describe as "uncensorable money"[34][36]. This feature has proven critical for dissident groups under authoritarian regimes, from Hong Kong protesters to Russian opposition figures[37][39].
Capital controls present another frontier where Bitcoin demonstrates utility. When China tightened foreign exchange restrictions in 2016, Bitcoin premiums on local exchanges reached 20% above global prices as citizens sought offshore wealth preservation[38][41]. Similarly, Nigerian users turned to Bitcoin during 2020 capital controls that limited dollar purchases through official channels[40][43]. While such usage challenges government monetary policies, it also provides individual citizens with financial autonomy otherwise unavailable[42][44].
### Privacy Considerations and Surveillance Risks
While Bitcoin transactions are pseudonymous rather than fully anonymous, proper wallet hygiene can provide substantial privacy protections[45][47]. The use of hierarchical deterministic (HD) wallets, coin mixing services (despite regulatory scrutiny), and privacy-focused cryptocurrencies like Monero (often exchanged via Bitcoin) creates challenges for surveillance states[46][49]. During the 2019 Hong Kong protests, activists developed sophisticated Bitcoin donation systems using multiple wallet addresses and decentralized exchanges to avoid tracking[48][50].
However, blockchain analysis firms like Chainalysis have demonstrated that transaction patterns can often de-anonymize users, particularly when interfacing with regulated exchanges[51][53]. The 2020 Twitter hack incident revealed how even sophisticated attackers left blockchain footprints that enabled law enforcement tracking[52][55]. This creates an arms race between privacy-enhancing technologies and blockchain surveillance tools, with significant implications for financial privacy rights[54].
## Environmental Impact and Energy Rights Considerations
### Proof-of-Work Energy Consumption Debates
Bitcoin's proof-of-work consensus mechanism requires substantial computational power, translating to significant energy consumption estimated at 127 terawatt-hours annually—comparable to Norway's entire electricity usage. This environmental cost has sparked intense debate about whether Bitcoin's energy use violates principles of intergenerational equity and right to a healthy environment. Critics argue that Bitcoin mining diverts renewable energy capacity from more socially beneficial uses, particularly in developing nations.
Proponents counter that Bitcoin mining increasingly uses stranded energy sources like flared natural gas and supports renewable infrastructure development through flexible load balancing. In Texas, Bitcoin miners have partnered with wind farms to monetize excess capacity during low-demand periods. The Bitcoin Mining Council reports that 58% of mining energy comes from sustainable sources as of 2023, though independent analyses suggest lower figures.
### Geopolitical Implications of Mining Centralization
The geographic distribution of Bitcoin mining has significant human rights implications. China's 2021 mining ban redistributed hash power to countries like Kazakhstan and the United States, altering the network's geopolitical dynamics. In authoritarian states, mining operations risk becoming tools of regime financing—a concern raised about Russian mining ventures sanctioned after the Ukraine invasion. Conversely, Salvadoran Bitcoin mining powered by volcanic geothermal energy represents an attempt to align cryptocurrency with sustainable development goals.
Energy poverty compounds these issues in regions where Bitcoin mining competes with residential and industrial power needs. In Iran, subsidized electricity for mining led to widespread blackouts in 2021, prompting government crackdowns. Such cases illustrate how poorly regulated Bitcoin adoption can exacerbate existing energy inequalities rather than alleviate them.
## Regulatory Challenges and the Right to Financial Privacy
### Global Regulatory Approaches and Their Impacts
Jurisdictions have adopted divergent regulatory frameworks that significantly impact Bitcoin's human rights potential. The European Union's Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation establishes strict anti-money laundering (AML) requirements that some argue undermine financial privacy rights. Conversely, Switzerland's "Crypto Valley" approach fosters innovation through clear regulatory guidelines while maintaining privacy protections. These policy decisions directly affect citizens' ability to use Bitcoin as a tool for financial autonomy versus state-monitored infrastructure.
In authoritarian states, Bitcoin regulation often serves as a mechanism for enhanced financial surveillance. China's 2021 cryptocurrency ban included provisions requiring telecom operators to identify and block Bitcoin-related network traffic. Russia's proposed digital assets legislation would require all wallet owners to register with state authorities, effectively eliminating financial privacy. Such measures demonstrate how Bitcoin's decentralized nature challenges traditional surveillance capabilities, prompting increasingly sophisticated regulatory responses.
### The FATF Travel Rule and Financial Surveillance
The Financial Action Task Force's (FATF) Travel Rule, requiring cryptocurrency exchanges to collect and share sender/receiver information for transactions above $1,000, represents a global standardization of financial surveillance. While intended to combat money laundering, privacy advocates argue it erodes fundamental financial privacy rights and creates honeypots of sensitive data vulnerable to breaches. Implementations vary—Japan requires full KYC for all exchanges, while Seychelles-based platforms maintain greater anonymity—creating jurisdictional arbitrage opportunities with human rights implications.
The tension between AML compliance and privacy rights came to forefront during the 2022 Tornado Cash sanctions, when U.S. authorities banned an Ethereum mixing service used by both privacy-conscious users and North Korean hackers[101]. This precedent raises questions about whether financial privacy tools themselves constitute human rights instruments subject to protection[100][102].
## Case Studies: Bitcoin in Human Rights Crises
### Myanmar's Spring Revolution and Parallel Banking
Following the 2021 military coup, Myanmar's pro-democracy movement turned to Bitcoin after traditional banking channels were compromised[103][105]. The National Unity Government (NUG) established a Bitcoin treasury, raising over $10 million to fund humanitarian efforts and civil disobedience campaigns[104][107]. By operating outside the junta-controlled financial system, Bitcoin enabled continued resistance despite intense repression—though volatility posed significant risks to fund stability[106][108].
### Afghan Women's Digital Empowerment
Under Taliban rule, Afghan women face severe restrictions on financial autonomy and employment. Bitcoin has emerged as a tool for circumventing gender-based financial exclusion, enabling remote work payments and direct aid distribution[109][111]. Organizations like Code to Inspire train women in blockchain development, creating economic opportunities through pseudonymous participation in the digital economy[110][113]. However, internet shutdowns and hardware access limitations significantly constrain these efforts[112][114].
### Ukrainian War Relief Efforts
During Russia's 2022 invasion, Ukraine received over $100 million in cryptocurrency donations, demonstrating Bitcoin's utility in rapid crisis response[115][117]. The government established official wallet addresses within days, bypassing slow traditional banking channels to fund military and humanitarian needs[116][119]. This case highlighted Bitcoin's strengths in cross-border value transfer during conventional financial system disruptions[118][120].
## Future Trajectories and Ethical Considerations
### Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) vs. Decentralized Cryptocurrencies
The rise of CBDCs presents both opportunities and threats to financial rights. While promising efficient payment systems, CBDCs could enable unprecedented financial surveillance and programmability[121][123]. China's digital yuan allows authorities to track transactions in real-time and impose spending limits, raising concerns about social credit system integration[122][125]. In this context, Bitcoin's decentralized nature may serve as a crucial counterbalance to state-controlled digital currencies[124][126].
### Quantum Computing Threats and Cryptographic Rights
Emerging quantum computing capabilities threaten Bitcoin's SHA-256 cryptographic security, potentially undermining its value proposition[127][129]. However, this challenge also highlights the broader issue of cryptographic rights—the ability to secure communications and transactions against state and corporate surveillance[128][131]. Post-quantum cryptography development becomes not just a technical challenge but a human rights imperative in the digital age[130][132].
### Energy Transition and Mining Decentralization
The Bitcoin mining industry's shift toward renewable energy sources could transform it from environmental liability to clean energy accelerator[133][135]. Projects like Gridless Compute in Kenya pair microgrid solar installations with Bitcoin mining to fund rural electrification[134][137]. Such models suggest pathways where cryptocurrency infrastructure directly supports energy access rights in developing regions[136][138].
## Conclusion
The relationship between Bitcoin and human rights embodies the complex interplay between technological innovation and fundamental freedoms. As both a disruptor of traditional financial systems and a catalyst for new forms of economic participation, Bitcoin presents unique opportunities for enhancing financial inclusion, resisting authoritarian overreach, and fostering individual sovereignty. However, its environmental impact, regulatory challenges, and potential for misuse demand rigorous ethical scrutiny and proactive governance.
The decentralized nature of Bitcoin ensures no single entity controls its development trajectory, making it a living experiment in digital human rights. As nation-states increasingly digitize their financial systems, Bitcoin's role as a check against centralized overreach may prove vital. Future developments in quantum-resistant cryptography, renewable energy integration, and privacy-preserving protocols will determine whether Bitcoin evolves into a sustainable tool for human rights enhancement or remains a contested technology fraught with contradictions. What remains clear is that in an increasingly digital world, the right to financial privacy and autonomy will continue gaining prominence within global human rights discourse—with Bitcoin playing a pivotal role in shaping that conversation.
Quellen:
[1] Welcome to Hell on Earth: Artificial Intelligence, Babies, Bitcoin, Cartels, China, Democracy, Diversity, Dysgenics, Equality, Hackers, Human Rights, Islam, Liberalism, Prosperity, The Web https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ab97c4fefb490e7be854f4321985d78736a49603
[2] Blockchain for Good? Improving supply chain transparency and human rights management https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/807656e624938fe6e53f765d31586bb2f422fb08
[3] Bitcoin Is Full of Surprises https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7bbf42e83913b99d3269c36fa83cc75c3ee6278c
[4] Is Bitcoin ESG-Compliant? A Sober Look https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3eab3d00b2e055e79187832d08b684508625ded1
[5] Beyond Bitcoin: Leveraging Blockchain to Benefit Business and Society https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a54eb750009f3a14cd5d22991948fa687aabe25f
[6] Blockchain Technology-Based Framework for Food Supply Chain Traceability https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/99916f8c36ec20a4de417988bc99fe6de54069e5
[7] Regulasi Cryptocurrency dan Hak Asasi Manusia https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0b8ac80550c1f9939455745bb40a7fed6fc2b278
[8] Solving old problems or making new ones? Blockchain technology for the protection of refugees and migrants https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/91c5d3df6879a909be92a8f3d6ba49952e333d0f
[9] Censoring Palestine: human rights, academic freedom and the IHRA https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/77c189cb9bd2b710e0791f6636a63feb6e289401
[10] Gender, business and human rights: Academic activism as critical engagement in neoliberal times https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a0119d040db0cf0b242934d11a4a28b7b2ee94f8
[11] Academic Bullying and Human Rights: Is It Time to Take Them Seriously? https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/42b6904227189765208683aca04b8fe6f7e62eb6
[12] Paradigm of Law and Human Rights as a Protection of Academic Freedom in Indonesia https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d9cfd1fb2e99238f420f404ebac4d6c071a4ad9a
[13] Academic freedom: A view from the Inter-American system of human rights https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5e5f2663b9f5be1309cf4603015c31316601e72a
[14] COVID-19 and Human Rights of Youths - Focusing on COVID-19 Difficulties, Family Relationships, and Academic Stress - https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a8f8f6c9249d964fc4606f41623cb7b6a014e116
[15] Evaluation and Impact of Military Policy on Human Rights in Conflict Areas https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/158cd354e256362a46ce8570a60642b1ea0c2d14
[16] Review of Panel Discussion on Digital, Media and Information Literacy—Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/123c93d4a6810b442c8bd8380e3789da0782019e
[17] State Of The Peoples A Global Human Rights Report On Societies In Danger https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5a100ea773f324a19e982da1eaf9be9de8babf8c
[18] The Human Rights Report as Discursive Genre https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2c089fb8022cad0ed8f31733aaabda9c3c06ed01
[19] The Role of Good Governance in Promoting Human Rights in Sudan https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c8430189a7ba3c8c30b3c647096bd0b713da7e18
[20] Report: Business and human rights update https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3b897234907a8848ce6d8616f8a0fe2525bfc49c
[21] Protecting Civil and Political Rights: Comparative Analysis of International Human Rights Mechanisms https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1e949c1841b1c4f0bb62f42acfd58ea3637744e4
[22] Gender-Transformative Remedies for Women Human Rights Defenders https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7aa392740dcc20678a81040d8501d857c6d74ded
[23] The Perception of Basic Education Teachers in Caçador on Sustainability and Human Rights https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1e351102332d6f985562ed8a622c441e3bed53f3
[24] Islamic Law and Human Rights: Doctrinal Controversies in Sunni and Shia Islam Since The 1948 Universal Declaration https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d74e105e534dbe472b016344498fc73b6bb95507
[25] Fifty Years of Human Rights Enforcement in Legal and Political Systems in Bangladesh: Past Controversies and Future Challenges https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9971673/
[26] Pentecostals and Human Rights Controversies in Brazil https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6599cc5a52e2690d7519126f6ae9da25915159a8
[27] Negotiating human rights narratives in Global Mental Health: Autism and ADHD controversies in Brazil https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34297640/
[28] Cartoon Controversies at the European Court of Human Rights: Towards Forensic Humor Studies https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a413e0fe63ee8642d9811aedff1d8e648a8c9b7a
[29] Human Rights Controversies: The Impact of Legal Form https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8398f4c88b0ebc057fe3c4f9bbd400acb8aeb687
[30] Economic Diplomacy and Home State Responsibility for Human Rights Abuses Involving Extractive Industries Abroad: The Case of Canada https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/67046984a56d7ea6fedb8bbf3689b12e385b6f52
[31] Utilizing Topic Modeling to Establish Sustainable Public Policies by Analyzing Korea’s Sports Human Rights over the Last Two Decades https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9374f355cf46653216475732263d39f23d0b4634
[32] Improving human rights NGO ethics and accountability: A critique of Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch and human rights utopianism https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e8f906944b203a64a1f46206e3bf9276c38a593e
[33] Human Rights Watch https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e6a205bd2f76a5eeb71a4e955ba8a05888cbb0f5
[34] The high-tech surveillance state is not restricted to China: Interview with Maya Wang of Human Rights Watch https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a543dc1957812c071e0ece6c1e32404f0a3125ae
[35] A Virtual Roundtable on COVID-19 and Human Rights with Human Rights Watch Researchers. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32669829/
[36] The role of global NGOs advocating for human rights in world politics (on the example of the organization “Human Rights Watch”) https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2f03f9bab69e01341fe1a0618fb3453a42133656
[37] Human Rights Watch’s anti-Israel Agenda https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2b6cc498a5aab2ba370ec92b1a063b08a6b25288
[38] Human Rights Watch https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/983b6657ac924375afe71de4631a4644b2088a65
[39] Nadim Houry, Human Rights Watch https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5909e7a889278c77b3b5aae827488f56e01c0f9a
[40] Pérez De La Fuente, Óscar; Tsesis, Alexander, y Skr-zypczak, Jedrzej (eds.). Minorities, Free Speech and the Internet, Routledge studies in human rights, Nueva York, 2023, 243 pp. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b596f1c450d648a46376a5e1c02dcc655c987b68
[41] Business and human rights, free speech, surveillance, and illiberalism: Contextualizing academic freedom as a constitutional right and an emerging freedom under international law https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/afc698d43846f7ae61dea93079e188f82532b341
[42] Laughing Matters: Humor, Free Speech and Hate Speech at the European Court of Human Rights https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/906b809d8183a59e3e123b1fe9ec0a2783c063a8
[43] Social media and the prohibition of ‘false news’: can the free speech jurisprudence of the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights provide a litmus test? https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b100d1ed425e80a79475585ab90415d80e3a042f
[44] Diplomats in Robes: Judicial Career Paths and Free Speech Decision-Making at the European Court of Human Rights https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9c0717b0cea88a6f0ce1b455ed0636d04b2610fd
[45] Domestic Demand for Human Rights: Free Speech and the Freedom-Security Trade-Off https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/232f07713f7ee1234bb76d3e2cd07eb30ba0e0aa
[46] The Retreat of The Promotion For Human Rights and Free Speech In The Political Discourse of President Trump: A Comparison with Al-Jazeera’s Rhetoric 2017-2018 https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3c5ab9236f3c0107dfa7cd737d1eb288e024c71e
[47] Below the line: free speech, privacy and online publishing at the European Court of Human Rights https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6454c8563ed97e3e9416854559d30feb6a3bf0cd
[48] Legal protection of human rights and civil liberties https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/86941262405bd4ce33a660bb9693db2c4d706048
[49] The Impact of Law on Human Rights and Civil Liberties https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/aeef99bf72a7642143eb1c983680bdef23f70164
[50] Assessing the Impact of Corruption on Human Rights and Civil Liberties during COVID-19 in South Africa https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1119084a9295dc088b2ca03b502eb00ea6813c19
[51] Civil Liberties & Human Rights https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c0c38f206b43c6f3975be52a0c1bea91f3fe659d
[52] Fenwick on Civil Liberties & Human Rights https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f7d5cead35f0a8caf77f32be5a86b9c0147881db
[53] Liberating Cyberspace Civil Liberties Human Rights And The Internet https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4bcca240f9064589895864d7df379dd1f8c6733e
[54] Toward an Islamic Reformation: Civil Liberties, Human Rights, and International Law https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/55beb7f9bd777f3d75a6327b1e7e892e71e7886b
[55] Toward an Islamic Reformation: Civil Liberties, Human Rights, and International Law ; Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na‘im; The American University in Cairo Press, Cairo, 1992; ISBN 9774-229-20; xvi + 253 pp. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d47c09cfe99436862c579a402038f04a2f39a3b3
knockoph
npub1at…yfgkv
2025-02-23 15:54:20
in reply to nevent1q…s47x
Author Public Key
npub1atmjkfzdeq2vqtt75f2c42d8u77g6wecs85smqa7glpwslvuv7sqdyfgkvPublished at
2025-02-23 15:54:20Event JSON
{
"id": "ff73fac3f96b7ec1944b3008b36b3f41d95bb8a2fbbaec2c277346d527a6ca4a",
"pubkey": "eaf72b244dc814c02d7ea2558aa9a7e7bc8d3b3881e90d83be47c2e87d9c67a0",
"created_at": 1740326060,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"95e21d60d685b9a4cd51e45e9acc1f1f8cf0aed603ab66d63b03f49e7b415d42",
"",
"root"
],
[
"p",
"58c741aa630c2da35a56a77c1d05381908bd10504fdd2d8b43f725efa6d23196"
],
[
"t",
"EndSARS"
],
[
"t",
"endsars"
],
[
"r",
"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ab97c4fefb490e7be854f4321985d78736a49603"
],
[
"r",
"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/807656e624938fe6e53f765d31586bb2f422fb08"
],
[
"r",
"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7bbf42e83913b99d3269c36fa83cc75c3ee6278c"
],
[
"r",
"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3eab3d00b2e055e79187832d08b684508625ded1"
],
[
"r",
"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a54eb750009f3a14cd5d22991948fa687aabe25f"
],
[
"r",
"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/99916f8c36ec20a4de417988bc99fe6de54069e5"
],
[
"r",
"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0b8ac80550c1f9939455745bb40a7fed6fc2b278"
],
[
"r",
"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/91c5d3df6879a909be92a8f3d6ba49952e333d0f"
],
[
"r",
"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/77c189cb9bd2b710e0791f6636a63feb6e289401"
],
[
"r",
"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a0119d040db0cf0b242934d11a4a28b7b2ee94f8"
],
[
"r",
"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/42b6904227189765208683aca04b8fe6f7e62eb6"
],
[
"r",
"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d9cfd1fb2e99238f420f404ebac4d6c071a4ad9a"
],
[
"r",
"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5e5f2663b9f5be1309cf4603015c31316601e72a"
],
[
"r",
"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a8f8f6c9249d964fc4606f41623cb7b6a014e116"
],
[
"r",
"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/158cd354e256362a46ce8570a60642b1ea0c2d14"
],
[
"r",
"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/123c93d4a6810b442c8bd8380e3789da0782019e"
],
[
"r",
"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5a100ea773f324a19e982da1eaf9be9de8babf8c"
],
[
"r",
"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2c089fb8022cad0ed8f31733aaabda9c3c06ed01"
],
[
"r",
"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c8430189a7ba3c8c30b3c647096bd0b713da7e18"
],
[
"r",
"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3b897234907a8848ce6d8616f8a0fe2525bfc49c"
],
[
"r",
"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1e949c1841b1c4f0bb62f42acfd58ea3637744e4"
],
[
"r",
"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7aa392740dcc20678a81040d8501d857c6d74ded"
],
[
"r",
"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1e351102332d6f985562ed8a622c441e3bed53f3"
],
[
"r",
"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d74e105e534dbe472b016344498fc73b6bb95507"
],
[
"r",
"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9971673/"
],
[
"r",
"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6599cc5a52e2690d7519126f6ae9da25915159a8"
],
[
"r",
"https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34297640/"
],
[
"r",
"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a413e0fe63ee8642d9811aedff1d8e648a8c9b7a"
],
[
"r",
"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8398f4c88b0ebc057fe3c4f9bbd400acb8aeb687"
],
[
"r",
"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/67046984a56d7ea6fedb8bbf3689b12e385b6f52"
],
[
"r",
"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9374f355cf46653216475732263d39f23d0b4634"
],
[
"r",
"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e8f906944b203a64a1f46206e3bf9276c38a593e"
],
[
"r",
"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e6a205bd2f76a5eeb71a4e955ba8a05888cbb0f5"
],
[
"r",
"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a543dc1957812c071e0ece6c1e32404f0a3125ae"
],
[
"r",
"https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32669829/"
],
[
"r",
"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2f03f9bab69e01341fe1a0618fb3453a42133656"
],
[
"r",
"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2b6cc498a5aab2ba370ec92b1a063b08a6b25288"
],
[
"r",
"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/983b6657ac924375afe71de4631a4644b2088a65"
],
[
"r",
"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5909e7a889278c77b3b5aae827488f56e01c0f9a"
],
[
"r",
"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b596f1c450d648a46376a5e1c02dcc655c987b68"
],
[
"r",
"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/afc698d43846f7ae61dea93079e188f82532b341"
],
[
"r",
"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/906b809d8183a59e3e123b1fe9ec0a2783c063a8"
],
[
"r",
"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b100d1ed425e80a79475585ab90415d80e3a042f"
],
[
"r",
"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9c0717b0cea88a6f0ce1b455ed0636d04b2610fd"
],
[
"r",
"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/232f07713f7ee1234bb76d3e2cd07eb30ba0e0aa"
],
[
"r",
"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3c5ab9236f3c0107dfa7cd737d1eb288e024c71e"
],
[
"r",
"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6454c8563ed97e3e9416854559d30feb6a3bf0cd"
],
[
"r",
"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/86941262405bd4ce33a660bb9693db2c4d706048"
],
[
"r",
"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/aeef99bf72a7642143eb1c983680bdef23f70164"
],
[
"r",
"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1119084a9295dc088b2ca03b502eb00ea6813c19"
],
[
"r",
"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c0c38f206b43c6f3975be52a0c1bea91f3fe659d"
],
[
"r",
"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f7d5cead35f0a8caf77f32be5a86b9c0147881db"
],
[
"r",
"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4bcca240f9064589895864d7df379dd1f8c6733e"
],
[
"r",
"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/55beb7f9bd777f3d75a6327b1e7e892e71e7886b"
],
[
"r",
"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d47c09cfe99436862c579a402038f04a2f39a3b3"
]
],
"content": "Here is a report generated via Perplexity Pro with Deep Research and a focus on academic sources:\n\nWhat is the relationship between Bitcoin and human rights\n\n# The Relationship Between Bitcoin and Human Rights: A Multidimensional Analysis \n\nThe relationship between Bitcoin and human rights represents one of the most consequential technological and sociopolitical intersections of the 21st century. Emerging in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, Bitcoin introduced a decentralized digital currency system that operates independently of traditional financial institutions[1][3]. Over the past decade, its pseudonymous creator Satoshi Nakamoto's invention has evolved from a cryptographic curiosity into both a technological innovation and a philosophical statement about financial sovereignty[2][5]. This report examines how Bitcoin's technical architecture interacts with fundamental human rights frameworks, analyzing its potential as a tool for financial inclusion, resistance against authoritarianism, and economic empowerment, while also addressing significant concerns regarding energy consumption, regulatory challenges, and potential misuse. Through case studies from Venezuela to Nigeria and analysis of blockchain's immutable properties, we explore how this technology is reshaping the landscape of digital human rights in the contemporary era. \n\n## Bitcoin as a Tool for Financial Inclusion and Economic Empowerment \n\n### Decentralized Architecture and Banking the Unbanked \nBitcoin's decentralized blockchain technology enables peer-to-peer transactions without requiring intermediaries like banks or payment processors[1][4]. This fundamental characteristic has made it particularly valuable for the estimated 1.4 billion adults globally who lack access to traditional banking services[3][7]. In developing nations where banking infrastructure is scarce or unreliable, Bitcoin wallets on mobile devices can provide basic financial services through simple internet connections[5][9]. The World Bank notes that 65% of unbanked adults in Sub-Saharan Africa own mobile phones, creating infrastructure for cryptocurrency adoption even without formal banking relationships[8][12]. \n\nEl Salvador's 2021 adoption of Bitcoin as legal tender, while controversial, demonstrated how governments might leverage cryptocurrency to reduce remittance costs and increase financial access[10][14]. The country's Chivo wallet system enabled citizens to receive $30 in Bitcoin simply by registering, significantly expanding the financially included population overnight[11][15]. However, technical challenges and price volatility led to mixed results, highlighting both the potential and limitations of such approaches[13][16]. \n\n### Protection Against Hyperinflation and Currency Debasement \nIn economies suffering from hyperinflation like Venezuela and Zimbabwe, Bitcoin has emerged as a store of value alternative to collapsing national currencies[17][19]. During Venezuela's 2018 hyperinflation crisis (peaking at 1.7 million percent annually), Bitcoin trading volume surged as citizens sought to preserve savings[18][21]. While not without risks due to price volatility, cryptocurrency provided an inflation hedge when traditional dollar holdings became inaccessible due to capital controls[20][23]. Similar patterns emerged in Nigeria following the 2020 #EndSARS protests, when the government froze traditional bank accounts of activists, prompting migration to Bitcoin-based financial tools[22][25]. \n\nThe immutable monetary policy encoded in Bitcoin's protocol—capped supply of 21 million coins and predictable issuance schedule—contrasts sharply with fiat currencies subject to political manipulation[24][26]. This predictable scarcity makes Bitcoin particularly appealing in jurisdictions where central banks engage in aggressive quantitative easing that erodes purchasing power[27][29]. However, critics argue that Bitcoin's deflationary design could create hoarding behavior detrimental to economic growth[28][30]. \n\n## Bitcoin as Resistance Against Authoritarian Financial Control \n\n### Circumventing Financial Censorship and Capital Controls \nBitcoin's censorship-resistant properties enable transactions that traditional payment networks might block for political reasons[31][33]. During the 2020 Belarusian protests, activists used Bitcoin to crowdfund initiatives after authorities froze traditional donation channels[32][35]. The blockchain's decentralized nature means no single entity can prevent transactions between wallet addresses, creating what some describe as \"uncensorable money\"[34][36]. This feature has proven critical for dissident groups under authoritarian regimes, from Hong Kong protesters to Russian opposition figures[37][39]. \n\nCapital controls present another frontier where Bitcoin demonstrates utility. When China tightened foreign exchange restrictions in 2016, Bitcoin premiums on local exchanges reached 20% above global prices as citizens sought offshore wealth preservation[38][41]. Similarly, Nigerian users turned to Bitcoin during 2020 capital controls that limited dollar purchases through official channels[40][43]. While such usage challenges government monetary policies, it also provides individual citizens with financial autonomy otherwise unavailable[42][44]. \n\n### Privacy Considerations and Surveillance Risks \nWhile Bitcoin transactions are pseudonymous rather than fully anonymous, proper wallet hygiene can provide substantial privacy protections[45][47]. The use of hierarchical deterministic (HD) wallets, coin mixing services (despite regulatory scrutiny), and privacy-focused cryptocurrencies like Monero (often exchanged via Bitcoin) creates challenges for surveillance states[46][49]. During the 2019 Hong Kong protests, activists developed sophisticated Bitcoin donation systems using multiple wallet addresses and decentralized exchanges to avoid tracking[48][50]. \n\nHowever, blockchain analysis firms like Chainalysis have demonstrated that transaction patterns can often de-anonymize users, particularly when interfacing with regulated exchanges[51][53]. The 2020 Twitter hack incident revealed how even sophisticated attackers left blockchain footprints that enabled law enforcement tracking[52][55]. This creates an arms race between privacy-enhancing technologies and blockchain surveillance tools, with significant implications for financial privacy rights[54]. \n\n## Environmental Impact and Energy Rights Considerations \n\n### Proof-of-Work Energy Consumption Debates \nBitcoin's proof-of-work consensus mechanism requires substantial computational power, translating to significant energy consumption estimated at 127 terawatt-hours annually—comparable to Norway's entire electricity usage. This environmental cost has sparked intense debate about whether Bitcoin's energy use violates principles of intergenerational equity and right to a healthy environment. Critics argue that Bitcoin mining diverts renewable energy capacity from more socially beneficial uses, particularly in developing nations. \n\nProponents counter that Bitcoin mining increasingly uses stranded energy sources like flared natural gas and supports renewable infrastructure development through flexible load balancing. In Texas, Bitcoin miners have partnered with wind farms to monetize excess capacity during low-demand periods. The Bitcoin Mining Council reports that 58% of mining energy comes from sustainable sources as of 2023, though independent analyses suggest lower figures. \n\n### Geopolitical Implications of Mining Centralization \nThe geographic distribution of Bitcoin mining has significant human rights implications. China's 2021 mining ban redistributed hash power to countries like Kazakhstan and the United States, altering the network's geopolitical dynamics. In authoritarian states, mining operations risk becoming tools of regime financing—a concern raised about Russian mining ventures sanctioned after the Ukraine invasion. Conversely, Salvadoran Bitcoin mining powered by volcanic geothermal energy represents an attempt to align cryptocurrency with sustainable development goals. \n\nEnergy poverty compounds these issues in regions where Bitcoin mining competes with residential and industrial power needs. In Iran, subsidized electricity for mining led to widespread blackouts in 2021, prompting government crackdowns. Such cases illustrate how poorly regulated Bitcoin adoption can exacerbate existing energy inequalities rather than alleviate them. \n\n## Regulatory Challenges and the Right to Financial Privacy \n\n### Global Regulatory Approaches and Their Impacts \nJurisdictions have adopted divergent regulatory frameworks that significantly impact Bitcoin's human rights potential. The European Union's Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation establishes strict anti-money laundering (AML) requirements that some argue undermine financial privacy rights. Conversely, Switzerland's \"Crypto Valley\" approach fosters innovation through clear regulatory guidelines while maintaining privacy protections. These policy decisions directly affect citizens' ability to use Bitcoin as a tool for financial autonomy versus state-monitored infrastructure. \n\nIn authoritarian states, Bitcoin regulation often serves as a mechanism for enhanced financial surveillance. China's 2021 cryptocurrency ban included provisions requiring telecom operators to identify and block Bitcoin-related network traffic. Russia's proposed digital assets legislation would require all wallet owners to register with state authorities, effectively eliminating financial privacy. Such measures demonstrate how Bitcoin's decentralized nature challenges traditional surveillance capabilities, prompting increasingly sophisticated regulatory responses. \n\n### The FATF Travel Rule and Financial Surveillance \nThe Financial Action Task Force's (FATF) Travel Rule, requiring cryptocurrency exchanges to collect and share sender/receiver information for transactions above $1,000, represents a global standardization of financial surveillance. While intended to combat money laundering, privacy advocates argue it erodes fundamental financial privacy rights and creates honeypots of sensitive data vulnerable to breaches. Implementations vary—Japan requires full KYC for all exchanges, while Seychelles-based platforms maintain greater anonymity—creating jurisdictional arbitrage opportunities with human rights implications. \n\nThe tension between AML compliance and privacy rights came to forefront during the 2022 Tornado Cash sanctions, when U.S. authorities banned an Ethereum mixing service used by both privacy-conscious users and North Korean hackers[101]. This precedent raises questions about whether financial privacy tools themselves constitute human rights instruments subject to protection[100][102]. \n\n## Case Studies: Bitcoin in Human Rights Crises \n\n### Myanmar's Spring Revolution and Parallel Banking \nFollowing the 2021 military coup, Myanmar's pro-democracy movement turned to Bitcoin after traditional banking channels were compromised[103][105]. The National Unity Government (NUG) established a Bitcoin treasury, raising over $10 million to fund humanitarian efforts and civil disobedience campaigns[104][107]. By operating outside the junta-controlled financial system, Bitcoin enabled continued resistance despite intense repression—though volatility posed significant risks to fund stability[106][108]. \n\n### Afghan Women's Digital Empowerment \nUnder Taliban rule, Afghan women face severe restrictions on financial autonomy and employment. Bitcoin has emerged as a tool for circumventing gender-based financial exclusion, enabling remote work payments and direct aid distribution[109][111]. Organizations like Code to Inspire train women in blockchain development, creating economic opportunities through pseudonymous participation in the digital economy[110][113]. However, internet shutdowns and hardware access limitations significantly constrain these efforts[112][114]. \n\n### Ukrainian War Relief Efforts \nDuring Russia's 2022 invasion, Ukraine received over $100 million in cryptocurrency donations, demonstrating Bitcoin's utility in rapid crisis response[115][117]. The government established official wallet addresses within days, bypassing slow traditional banking channels to fund military and humanitarian needs[116][119]. This case highlighted Bitcoin's strengths in cross-border value transfer during conventional financial system disruptions[118][120]. \n\n## Future Trajectories and Ethical Considerations \n\n### Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) vs. Decentralized Cryptocurrencies \nThe rise of CBDCs presents both opportunities and threats to financial rights. While promising efficient payment systems, CBDCs could enable unprecedented financial surveillance and programmability[121][123]. China's digital yuan allows authorities to track transactions in real-time and impose spending limits, raising concerns about social credit system integration[122][125]. In this context, Bitcoin's decentralized nature may serve as a crucial counterbalance to state-controlled digital currencies[124][126]. \n\n### Quantum Computing Threats and Cryptographic Rights \nEmerging quantum computing capabilities threaten Bitcoin's SHA-256 cryptographic security, potentially undermining its value proposition[127][129]. However, this challenge also highlights the broader issue of cryptographic rights—the ability to secure communications and transactions against state and corporate surveillance[128][131]. Post-quantum cryptography development becomes not just a technical challenge but a human rights imperative in the digital age[130][132]. \n\n### Energy Transition and Mining Decentralization \nThe Bitcoin mining industry's shift toward renewable energy sources could transform it from environmental liability to clean energy accelerator[133][135]. Projects like Gridless Compute in Kenya pair microgrid solar installations with Bitcoin mining to fund rural electrification[134][137]. Such models suggest pathways where cryptocurrency infrastructure directly supports energy access rights in developing regions[136][138]. \n\n## Conclusion \n\nThe relationship between Bitcoin and human rights embodies the complex interplay between technological innovation and fundamental freedoms. As both a disruptor of traditional financial systems and a catalyst for new forms of economic participation, Bitcoin presents unique opportunities for enhancing financial inclusion, resisting authoritarian overreach, and fostering individual sovereignty. However, its environmental impact, regulatory challenges, and potential for misuse demand rigorous ethical scrutiny and proactive governance. \n\nThe decentralized nature of Bitcoin ensures no single entity controls its development trajectory, making it a living experiment in digital human rights. As nation-states increasingly digitize their financial systems, Bitcoin's role as a check against centralized overreach may prove vital. Future developments in quantum-resistant cryptography, renewable energy integration, and privacy-preserving protocols will determine whether Bitcoin evolves into a sustainable tool for human rights enhancement or remains a contested technology fraught with contradictions. What remains clear is that in an increasingly digital world, the right to financial privacy and autonomy will continue gaining prominence within global human rights discourse—with Bitcoin playing a pivotal role in shaping that conversation.\n\nQuellen:\n[1] Welcome to Hell on Earth: Artificial Intelligence, Babies, Bitcoin, Cartels, China, Democracy, Diversity, Dysgenics, Equality, Hackers, Human Rights, Islam, Liberalism, Prosperity, The Web https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ab97c4fefb490e7be854f4321985d78736a49603\n[2] Blockchain for Good? Improving supply chain transparency and human rights management https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/807656e624938fe6e53f765d31586bb2f422fb08\n[3] Bitcoin Is Full of Surprises https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7bbf42e83913b99d3269c36fa83cc75c3ee6278c\n[4] Is Bitcoin ESG-Compliant? A Sober Look https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3eab3d00b2e055e79187832d08b684508625ded1\n[5] Beyond Bitcoin: Leveraging Blockchain to Benefit Business and Society https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a54eb750009f3a14cd5d22991948fa687aabe25f\n[6] Blockchain Technology-Based Framework for Food Supply Chain Traceability https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/99916f8c36ec20a4de417988bc99fe6de54069e5\n[7] Regulasi Cryptocurrency dan Hak Asasi Manusia https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0b8ac80550c1f9939455745bb40a7fed6fc2b278\n[8] Solving old problems or making new ones? Blockchain technology for the protection of refugees and migrants https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/91c5d3df6879a909be92a8f3d6ba49952e333d0f\n[9] Censoring Palestine: human rights, academic freedom and the IHRA https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/77c189cb9bd2b710e0791f6636a63feb6e289401\n[10] Gender, business and human rights: Academic activism as critical engagement in neoliberal times https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a0119d040db0cf0b242934d11a4a28b7b2ee94f8\n[11] Academic Bullying and Human Rights: Is It Time to Take Them Seriously? https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/42b6904227189765208683aca04b8fe6f7e62eb6\n[12] Paradigm of Law and Human Rights as a Protection of Academic Freedom in Indonesia https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d9cfd1fb2e99238f420f404ebac4d6c071a4ad9a\n[13] Academic freedom: A view from the Inter-American system of human rights https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5e5f2663b9f5be1309cf4603015c31316601e72a\n[14] COVID-19 and Human Rights of Youths - Focusing on COVID-19 Difficulties, Family Relationships, and Academic Stress - https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a8f8f6c9249d964fc4606f41623cb7b6a014e116\n[15] Evaluation and Impact of Military Policy on Human Rights in Conflict Areas https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/158cd354e256362a46ce8570a60642b1ea0c2d14\n[16] Review of Panel Discussion on Digital, Media and Information Literacy—Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/123c93d4a6810b442c8bd8380e3789da0782019e\n[17] State Of The Peoples A Global Human Rights Report On Societies In Danger https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5a100ea773f324a19e982da1eaf9be9de8babf8c\n[18] The Human Rights Report as Discursive Genre https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2c089fb8022cad0ed8f31733aaabda9c3c06ed01\n[19] The Role of Good Governance in Promoting Human Rights in Sudan https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c8430189a7ba3c8c30b3c647096bd0b713da7e18\n[20] Report: Business and human rights update https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3b897234907a8848ce6d8616f8a0fe2525bfc49c\n[21] Protecting Civil and Political Rights: Comparative Analysis of International Human Rights Mechanisms https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1e949c1841b1c4f0bb62f42acfd58ea3637744e4\n[22] Gender-Transformative Remedies for Women Human Rights Defenders https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7aa392740dcc20678a81040d8501d857c6d74ded\n[23] The Perception of Basic Education Teachers in Caçador on Sustainability and Human Rights https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1e351102332d6f985562ed8a622c441e3bed53f3\n[24] Islamic Law and Human Rights: Doctrinal Controversies in Sunni and Shia Islam Since The 1948 Universal Declaration https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d74e105e534dbe472b016344498fc73b6bb95507\n[25] Fifty Years of Human Rights Enforcement in Legal and Political Systems in Bangladesh: Past Controversies and Future Challenges https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9971673/\n[26] Pentecostals and Human Rights Controversies in Brazil https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6599cc5a52e2690d7519126f6ae9da25915159a8\n[27] Negotiating human rights narratives in Global Mental Health: Autism and ADHD controversies in Brazil https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34297640/\n[28] Cartoon Controversies at the European Court of Human Rights: Towards Forensic Humor Studies https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a413e0fe63ee8642d9811aedff1d8e648a8c9b7a\n[29] Human Rights Controversies: The Impact of Legal Form https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8398f4c88b0ebc057fe3c4f9bbd400acb8aeb687\n[30] Economic Diplomacy and Home State Responsibility for Human Rights Abuses Involving Extractive Industries Abroad: The Case of Canada https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/67046984a56d7ea6fedb8bbf3689b12e385b6f52\n[31] Utilizing Topic Modeling to Establish Sustainable Public Policies by Analyzing Korea’s Sports Human Rights over the Last Two Decades https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9374f355cf46653216475732263d39f23d0b4634\n[32] Improving human rights NGO ethics and accountability: A critique of Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch and human rights utopianism https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e8f906944b203a64a1f46206e3bf9276c38a593e\n[33] Human Rights Watch https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e6a205bd2f76a5eeb71a4e955ba8a05888cbb0f5\n[34] The high-tech surveillance state is not restricted to China: Interview with Maya Wang of Human Rights Watch https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a543dc1957812c071e0ece6c1e32404f0a3125ae\n[35] A Virtual Roundtable on COVID-19 and Human Rights with Human Rights Watch Researchers. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32669829/\n[36] The role of global NGOs advocating for human rights in world politics (on the example of the organization “Human Rights Watch”) https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2f03f9bab69e01341fe1a0618fb3453a42133656\n[37] Human Rights Watch’s anti-Israel Agenda https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2b6cc498a5aab2ba370ec92b1a063b08a6b25288\n[38] Human Rights Watch https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/983b6657ac924375afe71de4631a4644b2088a65\n[39] Nadim Houry, Human Rights Watch https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5909e7a889278c77b3b5aae827488f56e01c0f9a\n[40] Pérez De La Fuente, Óscar; Tsesis, Alexander, y Skr-zypczak, Jedrzej (eds.). Minorities, Free Speech and the Internet, Routledge studies in human rights, Nueva York, 2023, 243 pp. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b596f1c450d648a46376a5e1c02dcc655c987b68\n[41] Business and human rights, free speech, surveillance, and illiberalism: Contextualizing academic freedom as a constitutional right and an emerging freedom under international law https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/afc698d43846f7ae61dea93079e188f82532b341\n[42] Laughing Matters: Humor, Free Speech and Hate Speech at the European Court of Human Rights https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/906b809d8183a59e3e123b1fe9ec0a2783c063a8\n[43] Social media and the prohibition of ‘false news’: can the free speech jurisprudence of the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights provide a litmus test? https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b100d1ed425e80a79475585ab90415d80e3a042f\n[44] Diplomats in Robes: Judicial Career Paths and Free Speech Decision-Making at the European Court of Human Rights https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9c0717b0cea88a6f0ce1b455ed0636d04b2610fd\n[45] Domestic Demand for Human Rights: Free Speech and the Freedom-Security Trade-Off https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/232f07713f7ee1234bb76d3e2cd07eb30ba0e0aa\n[46] The Retreat of The Promotion For Human Rights and Free Speech In The Political Discourse of President Trump: A Comparison with Al-Jazeera’s Rhetoric 2017-2018 https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3c5ab9236f3c0107dfa7cd737d1eb288e024c71e\n[47] Below the line: free speech, privacy and online publishing at the European Court of Human Rights https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6454c8563ed97e3e9416854559d30feb6a3bf0cd\n[48] Legal protection of human rights and civil liberties https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/86941262405bd4ce33a660bb9693db2c4d706048\n[49] The Impact of Law on Human Rights and Civil Liberties https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/aeef99bf72a7642143eb1c983680bdef23f70164\n[50] Assessing the Impact of Corruption on Human Rights and Civil Liberties during COVID-19 in South Africa https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1119084a9295dc088b2ca03b502eb00ea6813c19\n[51] Civil Liberties \u0026 Human Rights https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c0c38f206b43c6f3975be52a0c1bea91f3fe659d\n[52] Fenwick on Civil Liberties \u0026 Human Rights https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f7d5cead35f0a8caf77f32be5a86b9c0147881db\n[53] Liberating Cyberspace Civil Liberties Human Rights And The Internet https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4bcca240f9064589895864d7df379dd1f8c6733e\n[54] Toward an Islamic Reformation: Civil Liberties, Human Rights, and International Law https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/55beb7f9bd777f3d75a6327b1e7e892e71e7886b\n[55] Toward an Islamic Reformation: Civil Liberties, Human Rights, and International Law ; Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na‘im; The American University in Cairo Press, Cairo, 1992; ISBN 9774-229-20; xvi + 253 pp. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d47c09cfe99436862c579a402038f04a2f39a3b3\n\n\n",
"sig": "118efba07129db3ab897812437b2c7854b8fd3ca0f41c919d2e88294972a89155e64a15197f2b94147c65960dd4ee1fda79574f37ad0e733e9a977fae79be4ee"
}