📅 Original date posted:2012-02-20
📝 Original message:On Monday, February 20, 2012 6:17:01 AM Michael Grønager wrote:
> Just posted this on the wiki BIP-13 discussion - should I make it into a
> BIP of its own ?
If you must. However, BIP 13 has been pretty much undisputed, and only held
back by BIP 16/17 so far...
> The "version" portion of the address has so far been labeled "network id",
> and indicates from which network and which chain the address can be used
> for.
Where do you see this? It has always been "version" as far as I am aware, and
we discussed formalizing the details of the bits in it a few months back.
In any case, it was certainly originally intended as "version" as can be
observed in Satoshi's reference implementation.
Luke-Jr [ARCHIVE] /
npub1dt…u7wrs
2023-06-07 03:08:15
in reply to nevent1q…ycq2
Author Public Key
npub1dtr22xd42nv07un2xq0rmtkqkjylgsmexau0anxxafa9xmmn2ncshu7wrsPublished at
2023-06-07 03:08:15Event JSON
{
"id": "ff3e8d432246c14112a2aede59cb3f34b0bfb2fac698ff59343563f2448debcc",
"pubkey": "6ac6a519b554d8ff726a301e3daec0b489f443793778feccc6ea7a536f7354f1",
"created_at": 1686107295,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"02827371c6a4dadf4370012ad20068cb130d335969263f3423ec10b269e811dc",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"c76df127c417946464be2c3052de3633b0993022e4235b3af21b569d0456052f",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"a277336e95d2d0a831fff67fc80d8082322689a88ede9f877fa246a02629a43f"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2012-02-20\n📝 Original message:On Monday, February 20, 2012 6:17:01 AM Michael Grønager wrote:\n\u003e Just posted this on the wiki BIP-13 discussion - should I make it into a\n\u003e BIP of its own ?\n\nIf you must. However, BIP 13 has been pretty much undisputed, and only held \nback by BIP 16/17 so far...\n\n\u003e The \"version\" portion of the address has so far been labeled \"network id\",\n\u003e and indicates from which network and which chain the address can be used\n\u003e for.\n\nWhere do you see this? It has always been \"version\" as far as I am aware, and \nwe discussed formalizing the details of the bits in it a few months back.\nIn any case, it was certainly originally intended as \"version\" as can be \nobserved in Satoshi's reference implementation.",
"sig": "f578dd89287028eff0351d5266dd154825cdf136531dec9bdcae51c29f28a49cf5a7aed1f9429baf368e710d9a1c09302afa60334af81c1068bf6123782aa127"
}