📅 Original date posted:2014-03-27
📝 Original message:On 03/27/2014 05:14 PM, Pieter Wuille wrote:
> That said, I'm not convinced about the extra layers. The "cointype" in
> my opinion isn't necessary inside the derivation. There is already
> support (4 bytes!) for magic bytes in the serialized form. Inside
Cointype in path is for separation purposes, not for identification.
--
Best Regards / S pozdravom,
Pavol Rusnak <stick at gk2.sk>
Pavol Rusnak [ARCHIVE] /
npub1wc…3hnuq
2023-06-07 15:16:19
in reply to nevent1q…skzw
Author Public Key
npub1wccnjljxnarlx564vuc37hmuzuffurljevjnmuq4u0vjmh7e933sn3hnuqPublished at
2023-06-07 15:16:19Event JSON
{
"id": "fa832360603ac637e6608ca84d66c9c5a1cde08ece6ff80d33239f4a27e9d98b",
"pubkey": "7631397e469f47f3535567311f5f7c17129e0ff2cb253df015e3d92ddfd92c63",
"created_at": 1686150979,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"d9ddea79394f356d989e65ab112610cc90e9929cf3c160da3cfe266aeba22200",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"99a5d32571a5290c596a0eb451b47d331d3a64df580da98dd2cd2a6c5dd46d02",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"5cb21bf5d7f25a9d46879713cbd32433bbc10e40ef813a3c28fe7355f49854d6"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2014-03-27\n📝 Original message:On 03/27/2014 05:14 PM, Pieter Wuille wrote:\n\u003e That said, I'm not convinced about the extra layers. The \"cointype\" in\n\u003e my opinion isn't necessary inside the derivation. There is already\n\u003e support (4 bytes!) for magic bytes in the serialized form. Inside\n\nCointype in path is for separation purposes, not for identification.\n\n-- \nBest Regards / S pozdravom,\n\nPavol Rusnak \u003cstick at gk2.sk\u003e",
"sig": "866a3f02f75f174467abfc70b5b162a7525ccf361e05fb525668d163c68591d0ace5c80ab8bb402eb2a31e9ae408b4c9964ec9ba94e3c4b5f528fee30738fa18"
}