krobbies on Nostr: For those who believe in a free and open Internet, Maher’s Signal role should be a ...

For those who believe in a free and open Internet, Maher’s Signal role should be a flashing warning sign. As she once explained, she abandoned the mission of a free and open Internet at Wikipedia, because those principles recapitulated a “white male Westernized construct” and “did not end up living into the intentionality of what openness can be.” The better path, in her view, is managed opinion, using, alternately, censorship and promotion of dissent—depending on context and goal—as the essential methods.

We’re entering a dangerous period in political technology, and Maher is in the thick of it. Under her ideology, “Internet freedom” is a tactic, not a principle, and “fighting disinformation” means speech suppression, including here at home. When people tell you who they are, believe them.

quoting
nevent1q…g6a4

A literal US intelligence agent working in digital censorship now chairs their board. Even if they weren't always compromised, they certainly are now.

https://www.city-journal.org/article/signals-katherine-maher-problem