📅 Original date posted:2015-08-10
📝 Original message:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Replying because.
On 08/10/2015 10:14 AM, Pieter Wuille wrote:
>
> On Aug 10, 2015 7:03 PM, "odinn via bitcoin-dev"
> <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> <mailto:bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org>> wrote: Note that
> I've
>> been in favor of going ahead with Cameron Garnham's dynamic
>> softfork proposal right now, which can be seen at
>> http://is.gd/DiFuRr
>
> No offence, but I think that anyone who claims a block size limit
> change can be done as a soft fork has some basic reading to do
> first.
Technically, my proposal has been thus:
"Note that I've
been in favor of going ahead with Cameron Garnham's dynamic softfork
proposal right now, which can be seen at http://is.gd/DiFuRr - testing
it out, seeing how that works, and at the same time making
preparations for moving forward with Garzik's BIP 100 (which could be
tailored or refined based on additional data gathered, without being
turned into a controversial fork"
To have quoted it only in part was unfair.
>
> Also, please keep this thread about Lightning.
Agreed.
>
> -- Pieter
>
- --
http://abis.io ~
"a protocol concept to enable decentralization
and expansion of a giving economy, and a new social good"
https://keybase.io/odinn
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVyOMjAAoJEGxwq/inSG8CmAQIAI5XrAIa8VrkFYLtJ8s0CHqj
kZrMatH2oVGGaENVChVDU7u4SGnMQdiJF32QY5Olih3ia1rAx9n43tiyPyUp8y0S
iLudwFfyvmzSyRdoLnTRbDYkiNUnuy9lppZsL+AtQWCpMLxBIObs1NnzP7je4Qn2
a8lWklMf9mmlCyhyah7kJPdZzECwfpz2ARk68iUUAuqqLcFM2afmzcgLh2PuDRhU
6Hjw7crTXA5AhPSeNNz1az0cq5MTUv46SAr3mbAiMjFwz7tFWSWEGMTaTdQ/Igwe
JeMARTJuxY7QL1XHAmKgfHUEi6mmW2LiG0vm6xp8XnRfsUNfDVZ8IsmYky7kDLM=
=5Aay
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
odinn [ARCHIVE] /
npub1xv…5j2ga
2023-06-07 17:33:04
in reply to nevent1q…wssr
Author Public Key
npub1xv3g4rkhj7eyape0cqjhc9g4ljdu5axqkgcdewma854a8r7e0mtsl5j2gaPublished at
2023-06-07 17:33:04Event JSON
{
"id": "f556343da361b6fb5191f56f677cab49d345bad7d95111f7469c460f2af95303",
"pubkey": "33228a8ed797b24e872fc0257c1515fc9bca74c0b230dcbb7d3d2bd38fd97ed7",
"created_at": 1686159184,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"c33253e971194f2c7907c001b126807e52ef4e506229e6eaa41e873f7674b436",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"a6f6d8e090c9b3c4f1e96988ac1f606342484938f30a650563864559dd2e40dc",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"5cb21bf5d7f25a9d46879713cbd32433bbc10e40ef813a3c28fe7355f49854d6"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-08-10\n📝 Original message:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----\nHash: SHA1\n\nReplying because.\n\nOn 08/10/2015 10:14 AM, Pieter Wuille wrote:\n\u003e \n\u003e On Aug 10, 2015 7:03 PM, \"odinn via bitcoin-dev\" \n\u003e \u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org \n\u003e \u003cmailto:bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e\u003e wrote: Note that\n\u003e I've\n\u003e\u003e been in favor of going ahead with Cameron Garnham's dynamic\n\u003e\u003e softfork proposal right now, which can be seen at\n\u003e\u003e http://is.gd/DiFuRr\n\u003e \n\u003e No offence, but I think that anyone who claims a block size limit\n\u003e change can be done as a soft fork has some basic reading to do\n\u003e first.\n\nTechnically, my proposal has been thus:\n\n\"Note that I've\nbeen in favor of going ahead with Cameron Garnham's dynamic softfork\nproposal right now, which can be seen at http://is.gd/DiFuRr - testing\nit out, seeing how that works, and at the same time making\npreparations for moving forward with Garzik's BIP 100 (which could be\ntailored or refined based on additional data gathered, without being\nturned into a controversial fork\"\n\nTo have quoted it only in part was unfair.\n\n\u003e \n\u003e Also, please keep this thread about Lightning.\n\nAgreed.\n\n\u003e \n\u003e -- Pieter\n\u003e \n\n- -- \nhttp://abis.io ~\n\"a protocol concept to enable decentralization\nand expansion of a giving economy, and a new social good\"\nhttps://keybase.io/odinn\n-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\nVersion: GnuPG v1\n\niQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVyOMjAAoJEGxwq/inSG8CmAQIAI5XrAIa8VrkFYLtJ8s0CHqj\nkZrMatH2oVGGaENVChVDU7u4SGnMQdiJF32QY5Olih3ia1rAx9n43tiyPyUp8y0S\niLudwFfyvmzSyRdoLnTRbDYkiNUnuy9lppZsL+AtQWCpMLxBIObs1NnzP7je4Qn2\na8lWklMf9mmlCyhyah7kJPdZzECwfpz2ARk68iUUAuqqLcFM2afmzcgLh2PuDRhU\n6Hjw7crTXA5AhPSeNNz1az0cq5MTUv46SAr3mbAiMjFwz7tFWSWEGMTaTdQ/Igwe\nJeMARTJuxY7QL1XHAmKgfHUEi6mmW2LiG0vm6xp8XnRfsUNfDVZ8IsmYky7kDLM=\n=5Aay\n-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----",
"sig": "dfd4c3f37c0dab959082a4ba31bea3a2732e3285b302cef3d9b98503a7e6117f632466e6d03cf150d724e8d5dc2072dbddcf4c9d04468e5a9ae21178850ee343"
}