Conversation Details on Nostr: 📝 Summary: Experts question the proposed scenario for double-spending in Bitcoin ...
📝 Summary: Experts question the proposed scenario for double-spending in Bitcoin transactions due to unclear identities. One-show signatures as double-spend protection are limited by miner-claimable fidelity bonds, which are less effective against adversarial miners. The enforceability of OP_CTV is suggested over APO for Ark’s ATLCs.
👥 Authors:
• David A. Harding ( David A. Harding [ARCHIVE] (npub16dt…4wrd) )
• moonsettler ( moonsettler [ARCHIVE] (npub1nt4…d2m3) )
• Burak Keceli ( Burak Keceli [ARCHIVE] (npub136r…pezn) )
📅 Messages Date Range: 2023-06-07 to 2023-06-11
✉️ Message Count: 3
📚 Total Characters in Messages: 4449
Messages Summaries
✉️ Message by David A. Harding on 07/06/2023:
A proposed scenario for double-spending in Bitcoin transactions is questioned due to the lack of clarity on the identity of the parties involved.
✉️ Message by Burak Keceli on 07/06/2023:
Using one-show signatures as double-spend protection is limited by miner-claimable fidelity bonds, which are less effective against adversarial miners.
✉️ Message by moonsettler on 11/06/2023:
The author questions the statement that “APO can emulate CTV” and discusses the consequences for Ark’s ATLCs, suggesting that OP_CTV is more enforceable.
Follow Bitcoin Mailing List (npub15g7…08lk) for full threads
Published at
2023-06-15 00:54:54Event JSON
{
"id": "b2d9873a887b55bf56f4651a69284f8d59f74680d9c22f480507ec140eae45e2",
"pubkey": "57fe4c4ae74215fb92bd0dcb8a7787c5e907db74e987f30f1acaaad9c3a0271f",
"created_at": 1686790494,
"kind": 30023,
"tags": [
[
"d",
"26e5f575-153d-4356-baf3-5e28047df0f6"
],
[
"title",
"Conversation Details"
],
[
"image",
"https://nostr.build/i/dbc5bd7993c8d036431edeefea63a2b3b796e1f49baf96bf6b09e13c8c662833.jpg"
],
[
"p",
"d3574a24208f4e3d0821bb4a69a0c3ae842043d444fa5c4a8c49c369918a6fb2"
],
[
"p",
"9aea8afdad20bf625005d962b4f7490065bbc193226d24c1a04c6303f4de9637"
],
[
"p",
"8e87b0e46f5c041398cb59050eabcb90d868e9a35879843e95aec07c1bf7ee9d"
],
[
"p",
"a23dbf6c6cc83e14cc3df4e56cc71845f611908084cfe620e83e40c06ccdd3d0"
]
],
"content": "📝 Summary: Experts question the proposed scenario for double-spending in Bitcoin transactions due to unclear identities. One-show signatures as double-spend protection are limited by miner-claimable fidelity bonds, which are less effective against adversarial miners. The enforceability of OP_CTV is suggested over APO for Ark's ATLCs.\n\n👥 Authors: \n• David A. Harding ( nostr:npub16dt55fpq3a8r6zpphd9xngxr46zzqs75gna9cj5vf8pknyv2d7equx4wrd )\n• moonsettler ( nostr:npub1nt4g4lddyzlky5q9m93tfa6fqpjmhsvnyfkjfsdqf33s8ax7jcmswjd2m3 )\n• Burak Keceli ( nostr:npub136rmper0tszp8xxttyzsa27tjrvx36drtpucg0544mq8cxlha6wshgpezn )\n\n📅 Messages Date Range: 2023-06-07 to 2023-06-11\n\n✉️ Message Count: 3\n\n📚 Total Characters in Messages: 4449\n\n## Messages Summaries\n\n✉️ Message by David A. Harding on 07/06/2023:\nA proposed scenario for double-spending in Bitcoin transactions is questioned due to the lack of clarity on the identity of the parties involved.\n\n✉️ Message by Burak Keceli on 07/06/2023:\nUsing one-show signatures as double-spend protection is limited by miner-claimable fidelity bonds, which are less effective against adversarial miners.\n\n✉️ Message by moonsettler on 11/06/2023:\nThe author questions the statement that \"APO can emulate CTV\" and discusses the consequences for Ark's ATLCs, suggesting that OP_CTV is more enforceable.\n\n\nFollow nostr:npub15g7m7mrveqlpfnpa7njke3ccghmpryyqsn87vg8g8eqvqmxd60gqmx08lk for full threads",
"sig": "d266498c9cd1dd955dd052dfa9468a680ad5b4b961dbf9d5128a88c74900aa2637e323ce3bb1b2b172498e48d39d118ce178fee8d6de0cca9edcdd1acd25b35a"
}