I wind up investing increasingly more energy in nostr, a decentralized person to person communication convention. Why? Read on.
The issue (as though you didn’t as of now have any idea) Since a long time ago, social media platforms have irked me. They have similar motivations — increment time nearby — basically in light of the promotion model for income.
They are encouraged to collect as much data as possible about their users by this model.
It boosts them to foster calculations that drive “commitment,” which simply implies snaps and consideration.
It boosts tribalism.
It encourages binary thinking (like “us” versus “them,” “black” versus “white,” and so on).
To expand supporters and reach, clients are boosted to play into the calculation, making a positive criticism circle — ridiculous posts intensified by the algo boosts comparative posts.
The algorithm can be used by social media companies to promote perspectives they agree with and to lower rank those they disagree with.
Social media companies are increasingly under pressure from governments and intelligence agencies to carry out their orders.
As we can see with Elon, CEOs of these businesses have tremendous authority over speech.
I could go on. My point is that we really want something else. something based on a variety of incentives. something that makes it hard to censor users and speech simply because they hold an opinion that is not popular. something that a CEO or government cannot simply disable.
Enter nostr Numerous of these issues appear to be fixed at the protocol level by Nostr. To grasp this, think about email. The basis of email is a protocol. Endless “clients” can use this convention. We can still communicate because you can use Yahoo mail and I can use Gmail. The same is true for Nostr, with the exception that we can use our username with any client and continue to communicate with various clients. It would resemble becoming ill of Gmail and changing to Yippee mail, yet every one of your messages accompany you.)
Nostr likewise takes into consideration a “an incentive for esteem” motivator model, because of the bitcoin lightning network mix. Rather than clients attempting to advance their presents on suit the calculation, they can be compensated straightforwardly for quality substance.
Imagine a Twitter or Facebook experience where users could receive micropayments for quality posts.
They produce an incentive for you, so you straightforwardly remunerate them likewise. omitting the need for the advertising model in exchange for value.
Perhaps you just send a couple of pennies, yet perhaps that is all the client would get from a promotion being seen. In any case, this cycle in a general sense changes the income model, removing the publicizing in the center.
Nostr might not work. Perhaps it will not have the option to scale. It’s possible that the incentive model of value for value won’t be effective enough. It’s possible that we won’t be able to eliminate the current platforms’ network effects. There are numerous ways that Nostr could fail, in my opinion.
Be that as it may, I’m burnt out on being trapped in unreasonable motivating force damnation.
Gone up against by the vulnerability representing things to come and the plainly bad course such countless things are moving, I will give my best for partake in and assemble the world I need to occupy. The world I need my children to live in.
Why I use Bitcoin? For this reason I Moral Boldness. To this end emptied my guts into planning an elective called Decisive Reasoning. I Nostr for this reason now.
I’m all for social media. The world requirements web-based entertainment. In any case, I might with a clean conscience at any point keep on taking part on these stages when there may (at last) be an elective that fixes the motivating forces.
I’m not erasing my records (yet). However, I will devote less time to them.
I’ve been on Nostr since early January. Assuming you need assistance giving it a shot, let me know. Getting started with Nostr is easy with this wealth of information.